From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
To: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 02/14] KVM: s390: selftest: memop: Replace macros by functions
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2023 13:00:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <147cbcff-b54c-90be-4bd0-6ac02f385528@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230125212608.1860251-3-scgl@linux.ibm.com>
On 1/25/23 22:25, Janis Schoetterl-Glausch wrote:
> Replace the DEFAULT_* test helpers by functions, as they don't
> need the exta flexibility.
s/exta/extra/
But if you want I can fix that up.
The __VA_ARGS__ often don't make it easier to understand therefore I'd
rather have a function so I'm happy this patch removes a bit of the magic:
Acked-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@linux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c | 82 +++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c
> index 9c05d1205114..df1c726294b2 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c
> @@ -48,6 +48,8 @@ struct mop_desc {
> uint8_t key;
> };
>
> +const uint8_t NO_KEY = 0xff;
> +
> static struct kvm_s390_mem_op ksmo_from_desc(const struct mop_desc *desc)
> {
> struct kvm_s390_mem_op ksmo = {
> @@ -85,7 +87,7 @@ static struct kvm_s390_mem_op ksmo_from_desc(const struct mop_desc *desc)
> ksmo.flags |= KVM_S390_MEMOP_F_INJECT_EXCEPTION;
> if (desc->_set_flags)
> ksmo.flags = desc->set_flags;
> - if (desc->f_key) {
> + if (desc->f_key && desc->key != NO_KEY) {
> ksmo.flags |= KVM_S390_MEMOP_F_SKEY_PROTECTION;
> ksmo.key = desc->key;
> }
> @@ -268,34 +270,28 @@ static void prepare_mem12(void)
> #define ASSERT_MEM_EQ(p1, p2, size) \
> TEST_ASSERT(!memcmp(p1, p2, size), "Memory contents do not match!")
>
> -#define DEFAULT_WRITE_READ(copy_cpu, mop_cpu, mop_target_p, size, ...) \
> -({ \
> - struct test_info __copy_cpu = (copy_cpu), __mop_cpu = (mop_cpu); \
> - enum mop_target __target = (mop_target_p); \
> - uint32_t __size = (size); \
> - \
> - prepare_mem12(); \
> - CHECK_N_DO(MOP, __mop_cpu, __target, WRITE, mem1, __size, \
> - GADDR_V(mem1), ##__VA_ARGS__); \
> - HOST_SYNC(__copy_cpu, STAGE_COPIED); \
> - CHECK_N_DO(MOP, __mop_cpu, __target, READ, mem2, __size, \
> - GADDR_V(mem2), ##__VA_ARGS__); \
> - ASSERT_MEM_EQ(mem1, mem2, __size); \
> -})
> +static void default_write_read(struct test_info copy_cpu, struct test_info mop_cpu,
> + enum mop_target mop_target, uint32_t size, uint8_t key)
> +{
> + prepare_mem12();
> + CHECK_N_DO(MOP, mop_cpu, mop_target, WRITE, mem1, size,
> + GADDR_V(mem1), KEY(key));
> + HOST_SYNC(copy_cpu, STAGE_COPIED);
> + CHECK_N_DO(MOP, mop_cpu, mop_target, READ, mem2, size,
> + GADDR_V(mem2), KEY(key));
> + ASSERT_MEM_EQ(mem1, mem2, size);
> +}
>
> -#define DEFAULT_READ(copy_cpu, mop_cpu, mop_target_p, size, ...) \
> -({ \
> - struct test_info __copy_cpu = (copy_cpu), __mop_cpu = (mop_cpu); \
> - enum mop_target __target = (mop_target_p); \
> - uint32_t __size = (size); \
> - \
> - prepare_mem12(); \
> - CHECK_N_DO(MOP, __mop_cpu, __target, WRITE, mem1, __size, \
> - GADDR_V(mem1)); \
> - HOST_SYNC(__copy_cpu, STAGE_COPIED); \
> - CHECK_N_DO(MOP, __mop_cpu, __target, READ, mem2, __size, ##__VA_ARGS__);\
> - ASSERT_MEM_EQ(mem1, mem2, __size); \
> -})
> +static void default_read(struct test_info copy_cpu, struct test_info mop_cpu,
> + enum mop_target mop_target, uint32_t size, uint8_t key)
> +{
> + prepare_mem12();
> + CHECK_N_DO(MOP, mop_cpu, mop_target, WRITE, mem1, size, GADDR_V(mem1));
> + HOST_SYNC(copy_cpu, STAGE_COPIED);
> + CHECK_N_DO(MOP, mop_cpu, mop_target, READ, mem2, size,
> + GADDR_V(mem2), KEY(key));
> + ASSERT_MEM_EQ(mem1, mem2, size);
> +}
>
> static void guest_copy(void)
> {
> @@ -310,7 +306,7 @@ static void test_copy(void)
>
> HOST_SYNC(t.vcpu, STAGE_INITED);
>
> - DEFAULT_WRITE_READ(t.vcpu, t.vcpu, LOGICAL, t.size);
> + default_write_read(t.vcpu, t.vcpu, LOGICAL, t.size, NO_KEY);
>
> kvm_vm_free(t.kvm_vm);
> }
> @@ -357,26 +353,26 @@ static void test_copy_key(void)
> HOST_SYNC(t.vcpu, STAGE_SKEYS_SET);
>
> /* vm, no key */
> - DEFAULT_WRITE_READ(t.vcpu, t.vm, ABSOLUTE, t.size);
> + default_write_read(t.vcpu, t.vm, ABSOLUTE, t.size, NO_KEY);
>
> /* vm/vcpu, machting key or key 0 */
> - DEFAULT_WRITE_READ(t.vcpu, t.vcpu, LOGICAL, t.size, KEY(0));
> - DEFAULT_WRITE_READ(t.vcpu, t.vcpu, LOGICAL, t.size, KEY(9));
> - DEFAULT_WRITE_READ(t.vcpu, t.vm, ABSOLUTE, t.size, KEY(0));
> - DEFAULT_WRITE_READ(t.vcpu, t.vm, ABSOLUTE, t.size, KEY(9));
> + default_write_read(t.vcpu, t.vcpu, LOGICAL, t.size, 0);
> + default_write_read(t.vcpu, t.vcpu, LOGICAL, t.size, 9);
> + default_write_read(t.vcpu, t.vm, ABSOLUTE, t.size, 0);
> + default_write_read(t.vcpu, t.vm, ABSOLUTE, t.size, 9);
> /*
> * There used to be different code paths for key handling depending on
> * if the region crossed a page boundary.
> * There currently are not, but the more tests the merrier.
> */
> - DEFAULT_WRITE_READ(t.vcpu, t.vcpu, LOGICAL, 1, KEY(0));
> - DEFAULT_WRITE_READ(t.vcpu, t.vcpu, LOGICAL, 1, KEY(9));
> - DEFAULT_WRITE_READ(t.vcpu, t.vm, ABSOLUTE, 1, KEY(0));
> - DEFAULT_WRITE_READ(t.vcpu, t.vm, ABSOLUTE, 1, KEY(9));
> + default_write_read(t.vcpu, t.vcpu, LOGICAL, 1, 0);
> + default_write_read(t.vcpu, t.vcpu, LOGICAL, 1, 9);
> + default_write_read(t.vcpu, t.vm, ABSOLUTE, 1, 0);
> + default_write_read(t.vcpu, t.vm, ABSOLUTE, 1, 9);
>
> /* vm/vcpu, mismatching keys on read, but no fetch protection */
> - DEFAULT_READ(t.vcpu, t.vcpu, LOGICAL, t.size, GADDR_V(mem2), KEY(2));
> - DEFAULT_READ(t.vcpu, t.vm, ABSOLUTE, t.size, GADDR_V(mem1), KEY(2));
> + default_read(t.vcpu, t.vcpu, LOGICAL, t.size, 2);
> + default_read(t.vcpu, t.vm, ABSOLUTE, t.size, 2);
>
> kvm_vm_free(t.kvm_vm);
> }
> @@ -409,7 +405,7 @@ static void test_copy_key_storage_prot_override(void)
> HOST_SYNC(t.vcpu, STAGE_SKEYS_SET);
>
> /* vcpu, mismatching keys, storage protection override in effect */
> - DEFAULT_WRITE_READ(t.vcpu, t.vcpu, LOGICAL, t.size, KEY(2));
> + default_write_read(t.vcpu, t.vcpu, LOGICAL, t.size, 2);
>
> kvm_vm_free(t.kvm_vm);
> }
> @@ -422,8 +418,8 @@ static void test_copy_key_fetch_prot(void)
> HOST_SYNC(t.vcpu, STAGE_SKEYS_SET);
>
> /* vm/vcpu, matching key, fetch protection in effect */
> - DEFAULT_READ(t.vcpu, t.vcpu, LOGICAL, t.size, GADDR_V(mem2), KEY(9));
> - DEFAULT_READ(t.vcpu, t.vm, ABSOLUTE, t.size, GADDR_V(mem2), KEY(9));
> + default_read(t.vcpu, t.vcpu, LOGICAL, t.size, 9);
> + default_read(t.vcpu, t.vm, ABSOLUTE, t.size, 9);
>
> kvm_vm_free(t.kvm_vm);
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-26 12:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-25 21:25 [PATCH v6 00/14] KVM: s390: Extend MEM_OP ioctl by storage key checked cmpxchg Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-25 21:25 ` [PATCH v6 01/14] KVM: s390: selftest: memop: Pass mop_desc via pointer Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-26 11:51 ` Janosch Frank
2023-01-25 21:25 ` [PATCH v6 02/14] KVM: s390: selftest: memop: Replace macros by functions Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-26 12:00 ` Janosch Frank [this message]
2023-01-25 21:25 ` [PATCH v6 03/14] KVM: s390: selftest: memop: Move testlist into main Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-26 12:03 ` Janosch Frank
2023-01-25 21:25 ` [PATCH v6 04/14] KVM: s390: selftest: memop: Add bad address test Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-26 15:23 ` Janosch Frank
2023-01-25 21:25 ` [PATCH v6 05/14] KVM: s390: selftest: memop: Fix typo Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-25 21:26 ` [PATCH v6 06/14] KVM: s390: selftest: memop: Fix wrong address being used in test Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-25 21:26 ` [PATCH v6 07/14] KVM: s390: selftest: memop: Fix integer literal Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-26 6:38 ` Thomas Huth
2023-01-25 21:26 ` [PATCH v6 08/14] KVM: s390: Move common code of mem_op functions into functions Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-26 6:48 ` Thomas Huth
2023-01-26 13:02 ` Janosch Frank
2023-01-26 16:47 ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-26 17:01 ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-25 21:26 ` [PATCH v6 09/14] KVM: s390: Dispatch to implementing function at top level of vm mem_op Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-26 12:13 ` Thomas Huth
2023-01-25 21:26 ` [PATCH v6 10/14] KVM: s390: Refactor absolute vm mem_op function Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-26 12:18 ` Thomas Huth
2023-01-26 13:02 ` Janosch Frank
2023-02-03 14:48 ` Janosch Frank
2023-02-03 15:32 ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-25 21:26 ` [PATCH v6 11/14] KVM: s390: Refactor absolute vcpu " Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-25 21:26 ` [PATCH v6 12/14] KVM: s390: Extend MEM_OP ioctl by storage key checked cmpxchg Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-26 8:19 ` Heiko Carstens
2023-01-26 16:10 ` Janosch Frank
2023-01-27 18:15 ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-28 9:29 ` kernel test robot
2023-01-28 14:38 ` kernel test robot
2023-01-28 14:38 ` kernel test robot
2023-01-25 21:26 ` [PATCH v6 13/14] Documentation: KVM: s390: Describe KVM_S390_MEMOP_F_CMPXCHG Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-25 21:26 ` [PATCH v6 14/14] KVM: s390: selftest: memop: Add cmpxchg tests Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=147cbcff-b54c-90be-4bd0-6ac02f385528@linux.ibm.com \
--to=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=scgl@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox