From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Shevchenko Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 19/32] crypto: ccp: Introduce the AMD Secure Processor device Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2017 15:55:18 +0200 Message-ID: <1488549318.20145.76.camel@linux.intel.com> References: <148846752022.2349.13667498174822419498.stgit@brijesh-build-machine> <148846777589.2349.11698765767451886038.stgit@brijesh-build-machine> <20170302173936.GC11970@leverpostej> <0db0055f-9208-524f-74aa-674894ee90d3@amd.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: simon.guinot@sequanux.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, rkrcmar@redhat.com, matt@codeblueprint.co.uk, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linus.walleij@linaro.org, gary.hook@amd.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, paul.gortmaker@windriver.com, hpa@zytor.com, cl@linux.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com, aarcange@redhat.com, sfr@canb.auug.org.au, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, bhe@redhat.com, xemul@parallels.com, joro@8bytes.org, x86@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, piotr.luc@intel.com, mingo@redhat.com, msalter@redhat.com, ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com, bp@suse.de, dyoung@redhat.com, thomas.lendacky@amd.com, jroedel@suse.de, keescook@chromium.org, arnd@arndb.de, toshi.kani@hpe.com, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, luto@kernel.org, devel@linuxdriverproject.org, bhelgaas@google.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mchehab@kernel.org, iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com, labbott@fedoraproject.org, To: Brijesh Singh , Mark Rutland Return-path: In-Reply-To: <0db0055f-9208-524f-74aa-674894ee90d3@amd.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2017-03-02 at 13:11 -0600, Brijesh Singh wrote: > Hi Mark, > > On 03/02/2017 11:39 AM, Mark Rutland wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 10:16:15AM -0500, Brijesh Singh wrote: > > > > > > +ccp-$(CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEV_CCP) += ccp-dev.o \ > > >       ccp-ops.o \ > > >       ccp-dev-v3.o \ > > >       ccp-dev-v5.o \ > > > -     ccp-platform.o \ > > >       ccp-dmaengine.o > > > > It looks like ccp-platform.c has morphed into sp-platform.c (judging > > by > > the compatible string and general shape of the code), and the > > original > > ccp-platform.c is no longer built. > > > > Shouldn't ccp-platform.c be deleted by this patch? > > > > Good catch. Both ccp-platform.c and ccp-pci.c should have been > deleted  > by this patch. I missed deleting it, will fix in next rev. Don't forget to use -M -C when preparing / sending patches. -- Andy Shevchenko Intel Finland Oy -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org