Re: [RFC PATCH 03/20] intel_iommu: add "svm" option

Raj, Ashok
2017-05-04T20:37:50Z

On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 02:28:53PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Apr 2017 18:53:17 +0800
> Peter Xu <peterx-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 06:06:33PM +0800, Liu, Yi L wrote:
> > > Expose "Shared Virtual Memory" to guest by using "svm" option.
> > > Also use "svm" to expose SVM related capabilities to guest.
> > > e.g. "-device intel-iommu, svm=on"
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Liu, Yi L <yi.l.liu-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
> > > ---
> > > hw/i386/intel_iommu.c | 10 ++++++++++
> > > hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h | 5 +++++
> > > include/hw/i386/intel_iommu.h | 1 +
> > > 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
> > > index bf98fa5..ba1e7eb 100644
> > > --- a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
> > > +++ b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
> > > @@ -2453,6 +2453,7 @@ static Property vtd_properties[] = {
> > > DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("x-buggy-eim", IntelIOMMUState, buggy_eim, false),
> > > DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("caching-mode", IntelIOMMUState, caching_mode, FALSE),
> > > DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("ecs", IntelIOMMUState, ecs, FALSE),
> > > + DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("svm", IntelIOMMUState, svm, FALSE),
> > > DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
> > > };
> > >
> > > @@ -2973,6 +2974,15 @@ static void vtd_init(IntelIOMMUState *s)
> > > s->ecap |= VTD_ECAP_ECS;
> > > }
> > >
> > > + if (s->svm) {
> > > + if (!s->ecs || !x86_iommu->pt_supported || !s->caching_mode) {
> > > + error_report("Need to set ecs, pt, caching-mode for svm");
> > > + exit(1);
> > > + }
> > > + s->cap |= VTD_CAP_DWD | VTD_CAP_DRD;
> > > + s->ecap |= VTD_ECAP_PRS | VTD_ECAP_PTS | VTD_ECAP_PASID28;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > if (s->caching_mode) {
> > > s->cap |= VTD_CAP_CM;
> > > }
> > > diff --git a/hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h b/hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h
> > > index 71a1c1e..f2a7d12 100644
> > > --- a/hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h
> > > +++ b/hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h
> > > @@ -191,6 +191,9 @@
> > > #define VTD_ECAP_PT (1ULL << 6)
> > > #define VTD_ECAP_MHMV (15ULL << 20)
> > > #define VTD_ECAP_ECS (1ULL << 24)
> > > +#define VTD_ECAP_PASID28 (1ULL << 28)
> >
> > Could I ask what's this bit? On my spec, it says this bit is reserved
> > and defunct (spec version: June 2016).
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=d42fde70849c5ba2f00c37a0666305eb507a47b8
>
> Do we really need to emulate the buggy implementation? Seems like we
> could just pretend bit28 never happened here and use bit40 instead.
>

Agree, bit28 can be gone.