From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Peter Feiner" <pfeiner@google.com>,
"David Matlack" <dmatlack@google.com>,
"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
"Xiao Guangrong" <xiaoguangrong@tencent.com>,
"Wanpeng Li" <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: nVMX: fix EPT permissions as reported in exit qualification
Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 13:23:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1494501810-11822-2-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1494501810-11822-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>
This fixes the new ept_access_test_read_only and ept_access_test_read_write
testcases from vmx.flat.
The problem is that gpte_access moves bits around to switch from EPT
bit order (XWR) to ACC_*_MASK bit order (RWX). This results in an
incorrect exit qualification. To fix this, make pt_access and
pte_access operate on raw PTE values (only with NX flipped to mean
"can execute") and call gpte_access at the end of the walk. This
lets us use pte_access to compute the exit qualification with XWR
bit order.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h b/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
index 56241746abbd..b0454c7e4cff 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
@@ -283,11 +283,13 @@ static int FNAME(walk_addr_generic)(struct guest_walker *walker,
pt_element_t pte;
pt_element_t __user *uninitialized_var(ptep_user);
gfn_t table_gfn;
- unsigned index, pt_access, pte_access, accessed_dirty, pte_pkey;
+ u64 pt_access, pte_access;
+ unsigned index, accessed_dirty, pte_pkey;
unsigned nested_access;
gpa_t pte_gpa;
bool have_ad;
int offset;
+ u64 walk_nx_mask = 0;
const int write_fault = access & PFERR_WRITE_MASK;
const int user_fault = access & PFERR_USER_MASK;
const int fetch_fault = access & PFERR_FETCH_MASK;
@@ -302,6 +304,7 @@ static int FNAME(walk_addr_generic)(struct guest_walker *walker,
have_ad = PT_HAVE_ACCESSED_DIRTY(mmu);
#if PTTYPE == 64
+ walk_nx_mask = 1ULL << PT64_NX_SHIFT;
if (walker->level == PT32E_ROOT_LEVEL) {
pte = mmu->get_pdptr(vcpu, (addr >> 30) & 3);
trace_kvm_mmu_paging_element(pte, walker->level);
@@ -313,8 +316,6 @@ static int FNAME(walk_addr_generic)(struct guest_walker *walker,
walker->max_level = walker->level;
ASSERT(!(is_long_mode(vcpu) && !is_pae(vcpu)));
- accessed_dirty = have_ad ? PT_GUEST_ACCESSED_MASK : 0;
-
/*
* FIXME: on Intel processors, loads of the PDPTE registers for PAE paging
* by the MOV to CR instruction are treated as reads and do not cause the
@@ -322,14 +323,14 @@ static int FNAME(walk_addr_generic)(struct guest_walker *walker,
*/
nested_access = (have_ad ? PFERR_WRITE_MASK : 0) | PFERR_USER_MASK;
- pt_access = pte_access = ACC_ALL;
+ pte_access = ~0;
++walker->level;
do {
gfn_t real_gfn;
unsigned long host_addr;
- pt_access &= pte_access;
+ pt_access = pte_access;
--walker->level;
index = PT_INDEX(addr, walker->level);
@@ -371,6 +372,12 @@ static int FNAME(walk_addr_generic)(struct guest_walker *walker,
trace_kvm_mmu_paging_element(pte, walker->level);
+ /*
+ * Inverting the NX it lets us AND it like other
+ * permission bits.
+ */
+ pte_access = pt_access & (pte ^ walk_nx_mask);
+
if (unlikely(!FNAME(is_present_gpte)(pte)))
goto error;
@@ -379,14 +386,16 @@ static int FNAME(walk_addr_generic)(struct guest_walker *walker,
goto error;
}
- accessed_dirty &= pte;
- pte_access = pt_access & FNAME(gpte_access)(vcpu, pte);
-
walker->ptes[walker->level - 1] = pte;
} while (!is_last_gpte(mmu, walker->level, pte));
pte_pkey = FNAME(gpte_pkeys)(vcpu, pte);
- errcode = permission_fault(vcpu, mmu, pte_access, pte_pkey, access);
+ accessed_dirty = have_ad ? pte_access & PT_GUEST_ACCESSED_MASK : 0;
+
+ /* Convert to ACC_*_MASK flags for struct guest_walker. */
+ walker->pt_access = FNAME(gpte_access)(vcpu, pt_access ^ walk_nx_mask);
+ walker->pte_access = FNAME(gpte_access)(vcpu, pte_access ^ walk_nx_mask);
+ errcode = permission_fault(vcpu, mmu, walker->pte_access, pte_pkey, access);
if (unlikely(errcode))
goto error;
@@ -403,7 +412,7 @@ static int FNAME(walk_addr_generic)(struct guest_walker *walker,
walker->gfn = real_gpa >> PAGE_SHIFT;
if (!write_fault)
- FNAME(protect_clean_gpte)(mmu, &pte_access, pte);
+ FNAME(protect_clean_gpte)(mmu, &walker->pte_access, pte);
else
/*
* On a write fault, fold the dirty bit into accessed_dirty.
@@ -421,10 +430,8 @@ static int FNAME(walk_addr_generic)(struct guest_walker *walker,
goto retry_walk;
}
- walker->pt_access = pt_access;
- walker->pte_access = pte_access;
pgprintk("%s: pte %llx pte_access %x pt_access %x\n",
- __func__, (u64)pte, pte_access, pt_access);
+ __func__, (u64)pte, walker->pte_access, walker->pt_access);
return 1;
error:
@@ -452,7 +459,7 @@ static int FNAME(walk_addr_generic)(struct guest_walker *walker,
*/
if (!(errcode & PFERR_RSVD_MASK)) {
vcpu->arch.exit_qualification &= 0x187;
- vcpu->arch.exit_qualification |= ((pt_access & pte) & 0x7) << 3;
+ vcpu->arch.exit_qualification |= (pte_access & 0x7) << 3;
}
#endif
walker->fault.address = addr;
--
1.8.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-11 11:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-11 11:23 [PATCH 0/2] KVM: nVMX: nested EPT fixes Paolo Bonzini
2017-05-11 11:23 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2017-05-12 3:59 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: nVMX: fix EPT permissions as reported in exit qualification Xiao Guangrong
2017-05-12 5:13 ` Xiao Guangrong
2017-05-11 11:23 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: nVMX: fix nEPT handling of guest page table accesses Paolo Bonzini
2017-05-12 7:38 ` Xiao Guangrong
2017-05-12 8:39 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-05-16 14:03 ` [PATCH 0/2] KVM: nVMX: nested EPT fixes Radim Krčmář
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1494501810-11822-2-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pfeiner@google.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpeng.li@hotmail.com \
--cc=xiaoguangrong@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox