From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Peter Feiner" <pfeiner@google.com>,
"David Matlack" <dmatlack@google.com>,
"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
"Xiao Guangrong" <xiaoguangrong@tencent.com>,
"Wanpeng Li" <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: nVMX: fix nEPT handling of guest page table accesses
Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 13:23:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1494501810-11822-3-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1494501810-11822-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>
The new ept_access_test_paddr_read_only_ad_disabled testcase
caused an infinite stream of EPT violations because KVM did not
find anything bad in the page tables and kept re-executing the
faulting instruction.
This is because the exit qualification said we were reading from
the page tables, but actually writing the cause of the EPT violation
was writing the A/D bits. This happened even with eptad=0, quite
surprisingly.
Thus, always treat guest page table accesses as read+write operations,
even if the exit qualification says otherwise. This fixes the
testcase.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
index c6f4ad44aa95..c868cbdad29a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
@@ -6209,17 +6209,19 @@ static int handle_ept_violation(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
u32 error_code;
exit_qualification = vmcs_readl(EXIT_QUALIFICATION);
+ gpa = vmcs_read64(GUEST_PHYSICAL_ADDRESS);
+ trace_kvm_page_fault(gpa, exit_qualification);
- if (is_guest_mode(vcpu)
- && !(exit_qualification & EPT_VIOLATION_GVA_TRANSLATED)) {
- /*
- * Fix up exit_qualification according to whether guest
- * page table accesses are reads or writes.
- */
- u64 eptp = nested_ept_get_cr3(vcpu);
- if (!(eptp & VMX_EPT_AD_ENABLE_BIT))
- exit_qualification &= ~EPT_VIOLATION_ACC_WRITE;
- }
+ /*
+ * All guest page table accesses are potential writes to A/D bits.
+ * but EPT microcode only reports them as such when EPT A/D is
+ * enabled. Tracing ept_access_test_paddr_read_only_ad_disabled (from
+ * kvm-unit-tests) with eptad=0 and eptad=1 shows that the processor
+ * does not change its behavior when EPTP enables A/D bits; the only
+ * difference is in the exit qualification. So fix this up here.
+ */
+ if (!(exit_qualification & EPT_VIOLATION_GVA_TRANSLATED))
+ exit_qualification |= EPT_VIOLATION_ACC_WRITE;
/*
* EPT violation happened while executing iret from NMI,
@@ -6231,9 +6233,6 @@ static int handle_ept_violation(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
(exit_qualification & INTR_INFO_UNBLOCK_NMI))
vmcs_set_bits(GUEST_INTERRUPTIBILITY_INFO, GUEST_INTR_STATE_NMI);
- gpa = vmcs_read64(GUEST_PHYSICAL_ADDRESS);
- trace_kvm_page_fault(gpa, exit_qualification);
-
/* Is it a read fault? */
error_code = (exit_qualification & EPT_VIOLATION_ACC_READ)
? PFERR_USER_MASK : 0;
@@ -6250,6 +6249,17 @@ static int handle_ept_violation(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
? PFERR_PRESENT_MASK : 0;
vcpu->arch.gpa_available = true;
+
+ if (is_guest_mode(vcpu)
+ && !(exit_qualification & EPT_VIOLATION_GVA_TRANSLATED)) {
+ /*
+ * Now fix up exit_qualification according to what the
+ * L1 hypervisor expects to see.
+ */
+ u64 eptp = nested_ept_get_cr3(vcpu);
+ if (!(eptp & VMX_EPT_AD_ENABLE_BIT))
+ exit_qualification &= ~EPT_VIOLATION_ACC_WRITE;
+ }
vcpu->arch.exit_qualification = exit_qualification;
return kvm_mmu_page_fault(vcpu, gpa, error_code, NULL, 0);
--
1.8.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-11 11:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-11 11:23 [PATCH 0/2] KVM: nVMX: nested EPT fixes Paolo Bonzini
2017-05-11 11:23 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: nVMX: fix EPT permissions as reported in exit qualification Paolo Bonzini
2017-05-12 3:59 ` Xiao Guangrong
2017-05-12 5:13 ` Xiao Guangrong
2017-05-11 11:23 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2017-05-12 7:38 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: nVMX: fix nEPT handling of guest page table accesses Xiao Guangrong
2017-05-12 8:39 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-05-16 14:03 ` [PATCH 0/2] KVM: nVMX: nested EPT fixes Radim Krčmář
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1494501810-11822-3-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pfeiner@google.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpeng.li@hotmail.com \
--cc=xiaoguangrong@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox