From: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
To: eric.auger.pro@gmail.com, eric.auger@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, marc.zyngier@arm.com,
cdall@linaro.org, peter.maydell@linaro.org,
andre.przywara@arm.com, wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com
Cc: wu.wubin@huawei.com
Subject: [PATCH v4 08/11] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-its: new helper functions to free the caches
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 09:10:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1508224209-15366-9-git-send-email-eric.auger@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1508224209-15366-1-git-send-email-eric.auger@redhat.com>
From: wanghaibin <wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com>
We create 2 new functions that frees the device and
collection lists. this is currently called by vgic_its_destroy()
and we will add other callers in subsequent patches.
We also remove the check on its->device_list.next as it looks
unnecessary. Indeed, the device list always is initialized
when vgic_its_destroy gets called: the kvm device is removed
by kvm_destroy_devices() which loops on all the devices
added to kvm->devices. kvm_ioctl_create_device() only adds
the device to kvm_devices once the lists have been initialized
(in vgic_create_its).
We also move vgic_its_free_device to prepare for new callers.
Signed-off-by: wanghaibin <wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
---
[Eric] removed its->device_list.next which is not needed as
pointed out by Wanghaibin. Reword the commit message
---
virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
index 1c3e83f..f3f0026f 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
@@ -611,6 +611,45 @@ static void its_free_ite(struct kvm *kvm, struct its_ite *ite)
kfree(ite);
}
+static void vgic_its_free_device(struct kvm *kvm, struct its_device *dev)
+{
+ struct its_ite *ite, *tmp;
+
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(ite, tmp, &dev->itt_head, ite_list)
+ its_free_ite(kvm, ite);
+ list_del(&dev->dev_list);
+ kfree(dev);
+}
+
+static void vgic_its_free_device_list(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_its *its)
+{
+ struct list_head *cur, *temp;
+
+ mutex_lock(&its->its_lock);
+ list_for_each_safe(cur, temp, &its->device_list) {
+ struct its_device *dev;
+
+ dev = list_entry(cur, struct its_device, dev_list);
+ vgic_its_free_device(kvm, dev);
+ }
+ mutex_unlock(&its->its_lock);
+}
+
+static void vgic_its_free_collection_list(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_its *its)
+{
+ struct list_head *cur, *temp;
+
+ list_for_each_safe(cur, temp, &its->collection_list) {
+ struct its_collection *coll;
+
+ coll = list_entry(cur, struct its_collection, coll_list);
+ list_del(cur);
+ kfree(coll);
+ }
+ mutex_unlock(&its->its_lock);
+}
+
+
static u64 its_cmd_mask_field(u64 *its_cmd, int word, int shift, int size)
{
return (le64_to_cpu(its_cmd[word]) >> shift) & (BIT_ULL(size) - 1);
@@ -1644,46 +1683,13 @@ static int vgic_its_create(struct kvm_device *dev, u32 type)
return vgic_its_set_abi(its, NR_ITS_ABIS - 1);
}
-static void vgic_its_free_device(struct kvm *kvm, struct its_device *dev)
-{
- struct its_ite *ite, *tmp;
-
- list_for_each_entry_safe(ite, tmp, &dev->itt_head, ite_list)
- its_free_ite(kvm, ite);
- list_del(&dev->dev_list);
- kfree(dev);
-}
-
static void vgic_its_destroy(struct kvm_device *kvm_dev)
{
struct kvm *kvm = kvm_dev->kvm;
struct vgic_its *its = kvm_dev->private;
- struct list_head *cur, *temp;
-
- /*
- * We may end up here without the lists ever having been initialized.
- * Check this and bail out early to avoid dereferencing a NULL pointer.
- */
- if (!its->device_list.next)
- return;
-
- mutex_lock(&its->its_lock);
- list_for_each_safe(cur, temp, &its->device_list) {
- struct its_device *dev;
-
- dev = list_entry(cur, struct its_device, dev_list);
- vgic_its_free_device(kvm, dev);
- }
-
- list_for_each_safe(cur, temp, &its->collection_list) {
- struct its_collection *coll;
-
- coll = list_entry(cur, struct its_collection, coll_list);
- list_del(cur);
- kfree(coll);
- }
- mutex_unlock(&its->its_lock);
+ vgic_its_free_device_list(kvm, its);
+ vgic_its_free_collection_list(kvm, its);
kfree(its);
}
--
2.5.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-17 7:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-17 7:09 [PATCH v4 00/11] vITS Migration fixes and reset Eric Auger
2017-10-17 7:09 ` [PATCH v4 01/11] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-its: fix return value for device table restore Eric Auger
2017-10-17 21:40 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-21 14:40 ` Auger Eric
2017-10-21 15:42 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-17 7:10 ` [PATCH v4 02/11] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-its: fix vgic_its_restore_collection_table returned value Eric Auger
2017-10-17 21:54 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-17 7:10 ` [PATCH v4 03/11] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-its: Improve error reporting on device table save Eric Auger
2017-10-17 22:00 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-17 7:10 ` [PATCH v4 04/11] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-its: Check CBASER/BASER validity before enabling the ITS Eric Auger
2017-10-17 22:02 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-17 22:05 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-17 7:10 ` [PATCH v4 05/11] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-its: Check GITS_BASER Valid bit before saving tables Eric Auger
2017-10-17 7:10 ` [PATCH v4 06/11] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-its: Check GITS_CBASER validity before processing commands Eric Auger
2017-10-17 22:10 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-18 14:34 ` Auger Eric
2017-10-17 7:10 ` [PATCH v4 07/11] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-its: Always attempt to save/restore device and collection tables Eric Auger
2017-10-17 22:15 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-17 7:10 ` Eric Auger [this message]
2017-10-17 22:24 ` [PATCH v4 08/11] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-its: new helper functions to free the caches Christoffer Dall
2017-10-17 7:10 ` [PATCH v4 09/11] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-its: free caches when GITS_BASER Valid bit is cleared Eric Auger
2017-10-17 22:34 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-21 10:13 ` Auger Eric
2017-10-21 14:31 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-21 14:36 ` Auger Eric
2017-10-21 15:42 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-17 7:10 ` [PATCH v4 10/11] KVM: arm/arm64: Document KVM_DEV_ARM_ITS_CTRL_RESET Eric Auger
2017-10-17 22:38 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-17 7:10 ` [PATCH v4 11/11] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-its: Implement KVM_DEV_ARM_ITS_CTRL_RESET Eric Auger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1508224209-15366-9-git-send-email-eric.auger@redhat.com \
--to=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
--cc=cdall@linaro.org \
--cc=eric.auger.pro@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=wu.wubin@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox