From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Tobin C. Harding" <me@tobin.cc>
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] docs: correct documentation for %pK
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 10:40:54 +1100
Message-ID: <1511826058-2563-2-git-send-email-me@tobin.cc>
References: <1511826058-2563-1-git-send-email-me@tobin.cc>
Cc: "Tobin C. Harding" <me@tobin.cc>,
        "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
        Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
        Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.ws>,
        "Roberts, William C" <william.c.roberts@intel.com>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
        Jordan Glover <Golden_Miller83@protonmail.ch>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
        Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        Will Deacon <wilal.deacon@arm.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Chris Fries <cfries@google.com>,
        Dave Weinstein <olorin@google.com>,
        Daniel Micay <danielmicay@gmail.com>,
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <1511826058-2563-1-git-send-email-me@tobin.cc>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org

Current documentation indicates that %pK prints a leading '0x'. This is
not the case.

Correct documentation for printk specifier %pK.

Signed-off-by: Tobin C. Harding <me@tobin.cc>
---
 Documentation/printk-formats.txt | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/printk-formats.txt b/Documentation/printk-formats.txt
index 361789df51ec..b4fe3c5f3b44 100644
--- a/Documentation/printk-formats.txt
+++ b/Documentation/printk-formats.txt
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ Kernel Pointers
 
 ::
 
-	%pK	0x01234567 or 0x0123456789abcdef
+	%pK	01234567 or 0123456789abcdef
 
 For printing kernel pointers which should be hidden from unprivileged
 users. The behaviour of ``%pK`` depends on the ``kptr_restrict sysctl`` - see
-- 
2.7.4