From: "Tobin C. Harding" <me@tobin.cc>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Tobin C. Harding" <me@tobin.cc>,
"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.ws>,
"Roberts, William C" <william.c.roberts@intel.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Jordan Glover <Golden_Miller83@protonmail.ch>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <wilal.deacon@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Chris Fries <cfries@google.com>,
Dave Weinstein <olorin@google.com>,
Daniel Micay <danielmicay@gmail.com>,
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] vsprintf: refactor pK code out of pointer()
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 10:40:55 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1511826058-2563-3-git-send-email-me@tobin.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1511826058-2563-1-git-send-email-me@tobin.cc>
Currently code to handle %pK is all within the switch statement in
pointer(). This is the wrong level of abstraction. Each of the other switch
clauses call a helper function, pK should do the same.
Refactor code out of pointer() to new function kernel_pointer().
Signed-off-by: Tobin C. Harding <me@tobin.cc>
---
lib/vsprintf.c | 97 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/vsprintf.c b/lib/vsprintf.c
index 1746bae94d41..360731f81dd3 100644
--- a/lib/vsprintf.c
+++ b/lib/vsprintf.c
@@ -1343,6 +1343,59 @@ char *uuid_string(char *buf, char *end, const u8 *addr,
return string(buf, end, uuid, spec);
}
+int kptr_restrict __read_mostly;
+
+static noinline_for_stack
+char *kernel_pointer(char *buf, char *end, const void *ptr,
+ struct printf_spec spec)
+{
+ spec.base = 16;
+ spec.flags |= SMALL;
+ if (spec.field_width == -1) {
+ spec.field_width = 2 * sizeof(ptr);
+ spec.flags |= ZEROPAD;
+ }
+
+ switch (kptr_restrict) {
+ case 0:
+ /* Always print %pK values */
+ break;
+ case 1: {
+ const struct cred *cred;
+
+ /*
+ * kptr_restrict==1 cannot be used in IRQ context
+ * because its test for CAP_SYSLOG would be meaningless.
+ */
+ if (in_irq() || in_serving_softirq() || in_nmi())
+ return string(buf, end, "pK-error", spec);
+
+ /*
+ * Only print the real pointer value if the current
+ * process has CAP_SYSLOG and is running with the
+ * same credentials it started with. This is because
+ * access to files is checked at open() time, but %pK
+ * checks permission at read() time. We don't want to
+ * leak pointer values if a binary opens a file using
+ * %pK and then elevates privileges before reading it.
+ */
+ cred = current_cred();
+ if (!has_capability_noaudit(current, CAP_SYSLOG) ||
+ !uid_eq(cred->euid, cred->uid) ||
+ !gid_eq(cred->egid, cred->gid))
+ ptr = NULL;
+ break;
+ }
+ case 2:
+ default:
+ /* Always print 0's for %pK */
+ ptr = NULL;
+ break;
+ }
+
+ return number(buf, end, (unsigned long)ptr, spec);
+}
+
static noinline_for_stack
char *netdev_bits(char *buf, char *end, const void *addr, const char *fmt)
{
@@ -1591,8 +1644,6 @@ char *device_node_string(char *buf, char *end, struct device_node *dn,
return widen_string(buf, buf - buf_start, end, spec);
}
-int kptr_restrict __read_mostly;
-
/*
* Show a '%p' thing. A kernel extension is that the '%p' is followed
* by an extra set of alphanumeric characters that are extended format
@@ -1792,47 +1843,7 @@ char *pointer(const char *fmt, char *buf, char *end, void *ptr,
return buf;
}
case 'K':
- switch (kptr_restrict) {
- case 0:
- /* Always print %pK values */
- break;
- case 1: {
- const struct cred *cred;
-
- /*
- * kptr_restrict==1 cannot be used in IRQ context
- * because its test for CAP_SYSLOG would be meaningless.
- */
- if (in_irq() || in_serving_softirq() || in_nmi()) {
- if (spec.field_width == -1)
- spec.field_width = default_width;
- return string(buf, end, "pK-error", spec);
- }
-
- /*
- * Only print the real pointer value if the current
- * process has CAP_SYSLOG and is running with the
- * same credentials it started with. This is because
- * access to files is checked at open() time, but %pK
- * checks permission at read() time. We don't want to
- * leak pointer values if a binary opens a file using
- * %pK and then elevates privileges before reading it.
- */
- cred = current_cred();
- if (!has_capability_noaudit(current, CAP_SYSLOG) ||
- !uid_eq(cred->euid, cred->uid) ||
- !gid_eq(cred->egid, cred->gid))
- ptr = NULL;
- break;
- }
- case 2:
- default:
- /* Always print 0's for %pK */
- ptr = NULL;
- break;
- }
- break;
-
+ return kernel_pointer(buf, end, ptr, spec);
case 'N':
return netdev_bits(buf, end, ptr, fmt);
case 'a':
--
2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-27 23:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-27 23:40 [PATCH 0/5] add printk specifier %px, unique identifier Tobin C. Harding
2017-11-27 23:40 ` [PATCH 1/5] docs: correct documentation for %pK Tobin C. Harding
2017-11-28 0:46 ` Kees Cook
2017-11-27 23:40 ` Tobin C. Harding [this message]
2017-11-27 23:40 ` [PATCH 3/5] vsprintf: add specifier %px, unique identifier Tobin C. Harding
2017-11-27 23:40 ` [PATCH 4/5] KVM: use %px to print token identifier Tobin C. Harding
2017-11-27 23:40 ` [PATCH 5/5] vfio_pci: " Tobin C. Harding
2017-11-28 0:03 ` [PATCH 0/5] add printk specifier %px, unique identifier Linus Torvalds
2017-11-28 1:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-11-28 6:26 ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-11-28 10:12 ` David Laight
2017-11-28 17:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-11-28 17:41 ` Joe Perches
2017-11-28 18:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-11-28 18:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-11-28 17:44 ` David Laight
2017-11-28 0:57 ` Kees Cook
2017-11-28 1:43 ` Tobin C. Harding
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1511826058-2563-3-git-send-email-me@tobin.cc \
--to=me@tobin.cc \
--cc=Golden_Miller83@protonmail.ch \
--cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cfries@google.com \
--cc=danielmicay@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ijc@hellion.org.uk \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=olorin@google.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=tycho@tycho.ws \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=wilal.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=william.c.roberts@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox