From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: KarimAllah Ahmed <karahmed@amazon.de>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org, Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
Asit Mallick <asit.k.mallick@intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Arjan Van De Ven <arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/5] KVM: x86: Add IBPB support
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2018 20:16:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1517602575.31953.74.camel@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180202195601.GD28192@char.us.oracle.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2099 bytes --]
On Fri, 2018-02-02 at 14:56 -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 06:02:24PM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 2018-02-02 at 12:49 -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > @@ -625,7 +629,12 @@ static inline int __do_cpuid_ent(struct
> > > > kvm_cpuid_entry2 *entry, u32 function,
> > > > if (!g_phys_as)
> > > > g_phys_as = phys_as;
> > > > entry->eax = g_phys_as | (virt_as << 8);
> > > > - entry->ebx = entry->edx = 0;
> > > > + entry->edx = 0;
> > > > + /* IBPB isn't necessarily present in hardware cpuid> */
> > > > + if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_IBPB))
> > > > + entry->ebx |= F(IBPB);
> > > > + entry->ebx &= kvm_cpuid_8000_0008_ebx_x86_features;
> > > > + cpuid_mask(&entry->ebx, CPUID_8000_0008_EBX);
> > > It is with x86/pti nowadays. I think you can remove that comment.
> > In this code we use the actual CPUID instruction, then filter stuff out
> > of it (with &= kvm_cpuid_XXX_x86_features and then cpuid_mask() to turn
> > off any bits which were otherwise present in the hardware and *would*
> > have been supported by KVM, but which the kernel has decided to pretend
> > are not present.
> >
> > Nothing would *set* the IBPB bit though, since that's a "virtual" bit
> > on Intel hardware. The comment explains why we have that |= F(IBPB),
> > and if the comment wasn't true, we wouldn't need that code either.
>
> But this seems wrong. That is on Intel CPUs we will advertise on
> AMD leaf that the IBPB feature is available.
>
> Shouldn't we just check to see if the machine is AMD before advertising
> this bit?
No. The AMD feature bits give us more fine-grained support for exposing
IBPB or IBRS alone, so we expose those bits on Intel too.
[-- Attachment #2: smime.p7s --]
[-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 5213 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-02 20:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-01 21:59 [PATCH v6 0/5] KVM: Expose speculation control feature to guests KarimAllah Ahmed
2018-02-01 21:59 ` [PATCH v6 1/5] KVM: x86: Update the reverse_cpuid list to include CPUID_7_EDX KarimAllah Ahmed
2018-02-02 17:37 ` Jim Mattson
2018-02-01 21:59 ` [PATCH v6 2/5] KVM: x86: Add IBPB support KarimAllah Ahmed
2018-02-02 17:49 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-02-02 18:02 ` David Woodhouse
2018-02-02 19:56 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-02-02 20:16 ` David Woodhouse [this message]
2018-02-02 20:28 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-02-02 20:31 ` David Woodhouse
2018-02-02 20:52 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-02-02 20:52 ` Alan Cox
2018-02-05 19:22 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-02-05 19:24 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-02-16 3:44 ` Jim Mattson
2018-02-16 4:22 ` Andi Kleen
2018-05-03 1:27 ` Wanpeng Li
2018-05-03 9:19 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-05-03 12:01 ` Wanpeng Li
2018-05-03 12:46 ` Tian, Kevin
2018-02-01 21:59 ` [PATCH v6 3/5] KVM: VMX: Emulate MSR_IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES KarimAllah Ahmed
2018-02-02 10:53 ` Darren Kenny
2018-02-02 17:35 ` Jim Mattson
2018-02-02 17:51 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-02-01 21:59 ` [PATCH v6 4/5] KVM: VMX: Allow direct access to MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL KarimAllah Ahmed
2018-02-02 11:03 ` Darren Kenny
2018-02-02 11:27 ` David Woodhouse
2018-02-02 17:53 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-02-02 18:05 ` David Woodhouse
2018-02-02 18:19 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-02-02 17:57 ` Jim Mattson
2018-02-01 21:59 ` [PATCH v6 5/5] KVM: SVM: " KarimAllah Ahmed
2018-02-02 11:06 ` Darren Kenny
2018-02-02 18:02 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1517602575.31953.74.camel@infradead.org \
--to=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=asit.k.mallick@intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
--cc=karahmed@amazon.de \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox