public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>, Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Tom Lendacky" <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 5/5] x86/kvm: Avoid dynamic allocation of pvclock data when SEV is active
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 09:13:23 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1536596003.11460.82.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180910155329.GB20286@zn.tnic>

On Mon, 2018-09-10 at 17:53 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 08:15:38AM -0500, Brijesh Singh wrote:
> > 
> > > 
> > > Now, the real question from all this SNAFU is, why can't all those point
> > > to a single struct pvclock_vsyscall_time_info and all CPUs read a single
> > > thing? Why do they have to be per-CPU and thus waste so much memory?
> You forgot to answer to the real question - why do we need those things
> to be perCPU and why can't we use a single instance to share with *all*
> CPUs?

I can't speak to the actual TSC stuff, but...

The pvclock ABI includes a per-vCPU bit, PVCLOCK_GUEST_STOPPED, to indicate
that the VM has been paused by the host.  The guest uses this information to
update its watchdogs to avoid false positives.  I have no idea if there are
use cases for setting STOPPED on a subset of vCPUs, but the ABI allows it so
here we are...

  reply	other threads:[~2018-09-10 16:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-07 17:57 [PATCH v6 0/5] x86: Fix SEV guest regression Brijesh Singh
2018-09-07 17:57 ` [PATCH v6 1/5] x86/mm: Restructure sme_encrypt_kernel() Brijesh Singh
2018-09-10 11:32   ` Borislav Petkov
2018-09-07 17:57 ` [PATCH v6 2/5] x86/mm: fix sme_populate_pgd() to update page flags Brijesh Singh
2018-09-10 11:36   ` Borislav Petkov
2018-09-10 12:28     ` Brijesh Singh
2018-09-10 12:32       ` Borislav Petkov
2018-09-07 17:57 ` [PATCH v6 3/5] x86/mm: add .data..decrypted section to hold shared variables Brijesh Singh
2018-09-10 11:54   ` Borislav Petkov
2018-09-10 12:33     ` Brijesh Singh
2018-09-07 17:57 ` [PATCH v6 4/5] x86/kvm: use __decrypted attribute in " Brijesh Singh
2018-09-10 12:04   ` Borislav Petkov
2018-09-10 13:15     ` Sean Christopherson
2018-09-10 13:29       ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-10 15:34       ` Borislav Petkov
2018-09-10 12:29   ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-09-10 12:33     ` Borislav Petkov
2018-09-10 12:46       ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-09-07 17:57 ` [PATCH v6 5/5] x86/kvm: Avoid dynamic allocation of pvclock data when SEV is active Brijesh Singh
2018-09-10 12:27   ` Borislav Petkov
2018-09-10 13:15     ` Brijesh Singh
2018-09-10 13:29       ` Sean Christopherson
2018-09-10 15:10         ` Brijesh Singh
2018-09-10 15:28           ` Sean Christopherson
2018-09-10 15:30             ` Brijesh Singh
2018-09-10 16:48               ` Borislav Petkov
2018-09-11  9:26                 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-09-11 10:01                   ` Borislav Petkov
2018-09-11 10:19                     ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-09-11 10:25                       ` Borislav Petkov
2018-09-11 11:07                         ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-09-11 13:55                           ` Borislav Petkov
2018-09-11 14:00                             ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-09-10 15:53       ` Borislav Petkov
2018-09-10 16:13         ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2018-09-10 16:14         ` Brijesh Singh
2018-09-10 12:28   ` Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1536596003.11460.82.camel@intel.com \
    --to=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox