From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: svm: support single stepping over emulated
 instructions
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2017 01:30:19 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <1586416935.1003490.1501738219700.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
References: <1501689810-20638-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <20170802201338.GA32318@flask>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, me@kylehuey.com
To: Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20170802201338.GA32318@flask>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org


> We already have b742c1e6e79d ("KVM: SVM: handle singlestep exception
> when skipping emulated instructions"), so the only applicable part of
> this patch is

Doh. :)

> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > index 0e846f0cb83b..931ba449456e 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > @@ -5548,6 +5548,7 @@ static void kvm_vcpu_do_singlestep(struct kvm_vcpu
> > *vcpu, int *r)
> >  		 */
> >  		vcpu->arch.dr6 &= ~15;
> >  		vcpu->arch.dr6 |= DR6_BS | DR6_RTM;
> > +		kvm_update_dr6(vcpu);
> >  		kvm_queue_exception(vcpu, DB_VECTOR);
> >  	}
> >  }
> 
> which makes sense.  And shouldn't we do the same for
> kvm_vcpu_check_breakpoint()?

Yes, will send v2.

Paolo