From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, borntraeger@de.ibm.com,
pasic@linux.ibm.com, richard.henderson@linaro.org,
david@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com,
pbonzini@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, ehabkost@redhat.com,
marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com, eblake@redhat.com, armbru@redhat.com,
seiden@linux.ibm.com, nrb@linux.ibm.com, nsg@linux.ibm.com,
frankja@linux.ibm.com, berrange@redhat.com, clg@kaod.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 08/11] qapi/s390x/cpu topology: x-set-cpu-topology monitor command
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2023 15:03:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <16114dce-778c-1416-5b68-4ee3bea135c0@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <92f02547-569f-2ea8-455b-585dcfaa2a74@redhat.com>
On 2/6/23 13:21, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 01/02/2023 14.20, Pierre Morel wrote:
>> The modification of the CPU attributes are done through a monitor
>> command.
>>
>> It allows to move the core inside the topology tree to optimise
>
> I'm not a native speaker, but "optimize" is more common, I think?
Yes. I will stick on it.
>
>> the cache usage in the case the host's hypervisor previously
>> moved the CPU.
>>
>> The same command allows to modify the CPU attributes modifiers
>> like polarization entitlement and the dedicated attribute to notify
>> the guest if the host admin modified scheduling or dedication of a vCPU.
>>
>> With this knowledge the guest has the possibility to optimize the
>> usage of the vCPUs.
>>
>> The command is made experimental for the moment.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> qapi/machine-target.json | 29 +++++++++++++
>> include/monitor/hmp.h | 1 +
>> hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c | 88 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> hmp-commands.hx | 16 ++++++++
>> 4 files changed, 134 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/qapi/machine-target.json b/qapi/machine-target.json
>> index 2e267fa458..58df0f5061 100644
>> --- a/qapi/machine-target.json
>> +++ b/qapi/machine-target.json
>> @@ -342,3 +342,32 @@
>> 'TARGET_S390X',
>> 'TARGET_MIPS',
>> 'TARGET_LOONGARCH64' ] } }
>> +
>> +##
>> +# @x-set-cpu-topology:
>> +#
>> +# @core: the vCPU ID to be moved
>> +# @socket: the destination socket where to move the vCPU
>> +# @book: the destination book where to move the vCPU
>> +# @drawer: the destination drawer where to move the vCPU
>> +# @polarity: optional polarity, default is last polarity set by the
>> guest
>
> Hmm, below you do something like that:
>
> if (!has_polarity) {
> polarity = POLARITY_VERTICAL_MEDIUM;
> } >
> ... so it rather seems like medium polarity is the default? ... that
> looks weird. I think you should maybe rather pass the has_polarity and
> has_dedication flags to the s390_change_topology() function and only
> change the value if they have really been provided?
OK, I will change this incoherence.
>
>> +# @dedicated: optional, if the vCPU is dedicated to a real CPU
>> +#
>> +# Modifies the topology by moving the CPU inside the topology
>> +# tree or by changing a modifier attribute of a CPU.
>> +#
>> +# Returns: Nothing on success, the reason on failure.
>> +#
>> +# Since: <next qemu stable release, eg. 1.0>
>
> Please replace with "Since: 8.0" ... I hope we'll get it merged during
> this cycle!
OK. :)
>
>> +{ 'command': 'x-set-cpu-topology',
>> + 'data': {
>> + 'core': 'int',
>> + 'socket': 'int',
>> + 'book': 'int',
>> + 'drawer': 'int',
>> + '*polarity': 'int',
>> + '*dedicated': 'bool'
>> + },
>> + 'if': { 'all': [ 'TARGET_S390X', 'CONFIG_KVM' ] }
>> +}
>> diff --git a/include/monitor/hmp.h b/include/monitor/hmp.h
>> index 1b3bdcb446..12827479cf 100644
>> --- a/include/monitor/hmp.h
>> +++ b/include/monitor/hmp.h
>> @@ -151,5 +151,6 @@ void hmp_human_readable_text_helper(Monitor *mon,
>> HumanReadableText
>> *(*qmp_handler)(Error **));
>> void hmp_info_stats(Monitor *mon, const QDict *qdict);
>> void hmp_pcie_aer_inject_error(Monitor *mon, const QDict *qdict);
>> +void hmp_x_set_cpu_topology(Monitor *mon, const QDict *qdict);
>> #endif
>> diff --git a/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c b/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c
>> index c33378577b..6c50050991 100644
>> --- a/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c
>> +++ b/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c
>> @@ -18,6 +18,10 @@
>> #include "target/s390x/cpu.h"
>> #include "hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.h"
>> #include "hw/s390x/cpu-topology.h"
>> +#include "qapi/qapi-commands-machine-target.h"
>> +#include "qapi/qmp/qdict.h"
>> +#include "monitor/hmp.h"
>> +#include "monitor/monitor.h"
>> /*
>> * s390_topology is used to keep the topology information.
>> @@ -379,3 +383,87 @@ void s390_topology_set_cpu(MachineState *ms,
>> S390CPU *cpu, Error **errp)
>> /* topology tree is reflected in props */
>> s390_update_cpu_props(ms, cpu);
>> }
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * qmp and hmp implementations
>> + */
>> +
>> +static void s390_change_topology(int64_t core_id, int64_t socket_id,
>> + int64_t book_id, int64_t drawer_id,
>> + int64_t polarity, bool dedicated,
>> + Error **errp)
>> +{
>> + MachineState *ms = current_machine;
>> + S390CPU *cpu;
>> + ERRP_GUARD();
>> +
>> + cpu = (S390CPU *)ms->possible_cpus->cpus[core_id].cpu;
>
> I think you should add a sanity check for core_id being in a valid range
> ... otherwise this will cause an access beyond the end of the array if
> core_id is too big or negative.
Right, I will also change the int64_t for the declaration of the core,
socket etc to uint16_t so avoiding a check for negative values.
>
>> + if (!cpu) {
>> + error_setg(errp, "Core-id %ld does not exist!", core_id);
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* Verify the new topology */
>> + s390_topology_check(cpu, errp);
>> + if (*errp) {
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* Move the CPU into its new socket */
>> + s390_set_core_in_socket(cpu, drawer_id, book_id, socket_id, true,
>> errp);
>> +
>> + /* All checks done, report topology in environment */
>> + cpu->env.drawer_id = drawer_id;
>> + cpu->env.book_id = book_id;
>> + cpu->env.socket_id = socket_id;
>> + cpu->env.dedicated = dedicated;
>> + cpu->env.entitlement = polarity;
>
> As mentioned above, I think dedicated and polarity should only be
> changed if they have really been provided?
right, I do this.
>
>> + /* topology tree is reflected in props */
>> + s390_update_cpu_props(ms, cpu);
>> +
>> + /* Advertise the topology change */
>> + s390_cpu_topology_set_modified();
>> +}
>> +
>> +void qmp_x_set_cpu_topology(int64_t core, int64_t socket,
>> + int64_t book, int64_t drawer,
>> + bool has_polarity, int64_t polarity,
>> + bool has_dedicated, bool dedicated,
>> + Error **errp)
>> +{
>> + ERRP_GUARD();
>> +
>> + if (!s390_has_topology()) {
>> + error_setg(errp, "This machine doesn't support topology");
>> + return;
>> + }
>> + if (!has_polarity) {
>> + polarity = POLARITY_VERTICAL_MEDIUM;
>> + }
>> + if (!has_dedicated) {
>> + dedicated = false;
>> + }
>> + s390_change_topology(core, socket, book, drawer, polarity,
>> dedicated, errp);
>> +}
>> +
>> +void hmp_x_set_cpu_topology(Monitor *mon, const QDict *qdict)
>> +{
>> + const int64_t core = qdict_get_int(qdict, "core");
>> + const int64_t socket = qdict_get_int(qdict, "socket");
>> + const int64_t book = qdict_get_int(qdict, "book");
>> + const int64_t drawer = qdict_get_int(qdict, "drawer");
>> + bool has_polarity = qdict_haskey(qdict, "polarity");
>> + const int64_t polarity = qdict_get_try_int(qdict, "polarity", 0);
>> + bool has_dedicated = qdict_haskey(qdict, "dedicated");
>> + const bool dedicated = qdict_get_try_bool(qdict, "dedicated",
>> false);
>> + Error *local_err = NULL;
>> +
>> + qmp_x_set_cpu_topology(core, socket, book, drawer,
>> + has_polarity, polarity,
>> + has_dedicated, dedicated,
>> + &local_err);
>> + if (hmp_handle_error(mon, local_err)) {
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +}
>> diff --git a/hmp-commands.hx b/hmp-commands.hx
>> index 673e39a697..bb3c908356 100644
>> --- a/hmp-commands.hx
>> +++ b/hmp-commands.hx
>> @@ -1815,3 +1815,19 @@ SRST
>> Dump the FDT in dtb format to *filename*.
>> ERST
>> #endif
>> +
>> +#if defined(TARGET_S390X) && defined(CONFIG_KVM)
>> + {
>> + .name = "x-set-cpu-topology",
>> + .args_type =
>> "core:l,socket:l,book:l,drawer:l,polarity:l?,dedicated:b?",
>> + .params = "core socket book drawer [polarity] [dedicated]",
>> + .help = "Move CPU 'core' to 'socket/book/drawer' "
>> + "optionaly modifies polarity and dedication",
>
> optionaly ==> optionally
OK
>
>> + .cmd = hmp_x_set_cpu_topology,
>> + },
>> +
>> +SRST
>> +``x-set-cpu-topology`` *core* *socket* *book* *drawer* *polarity*
>> *dedicated*
>> + Moves the CPU *core* to *socket* *book* *drawer* with *polarity*
>> *dedicated*.
>> +ERST
>> +#endif
>
> Thomas
>
Thanks,
Regards,
Pierre
--
Pierre Morel
IBM Lab Boeblingen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-06 14:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-01 13:20 [PATCH v15 00/11] s390x: CPU Topology Pierre Morel
2023-02-01 13:20 ` [PATCH v15 01/11] s390x/cpu topology: adding s390 specificities to CPU topology Pierre Morel
2023-02-02 10:44 ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-02 13:15 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-02 16:05 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-03 9:39 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-03 11:21 ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-08 17:50 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-10 14:19 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-01 13:20 ` [PATCH v15 02/11] s390x/cpu topology: add topology entries on CPU hotplug Pierre Morel
2023-02-02 16:42 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-03 9:21 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-03 13:22 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-03 14:40 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-03 15:38 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-01 13:20 ` [PATCH v15 03/11] target/s390x/cpu topology: handle STSI(15) and build the SYSIB Pierre Morel
2023-02-03 17:36 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-06 10:06 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-06 10:32 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-06 11:24 ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-06 12:57 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-09 16:39 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-10 14:16 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-01 13:20 ` [PATCH v15 04/11] s390x/sclp: reporting the maximum nested topology entries Pierre Morel
2023-02-06 10:13 ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-06 10:19 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-01 13:20 ` [PATCH v15 05/11] s390x/cpu topology: resetting the Topology-Change-Report Pierre Morel
2023-02-06 11:05 ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-06 12:50 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-06 17:52 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-07 9:24 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-07 10:50 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-07 12:19 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-07 13:37 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-07 14:08 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-01 13:20 ` [PATCH v15 06/11] s390x/cpu topology: interception of PTF instruction Pierre Morel
2023-02-06 11:38 ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-06 13:02 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-06 18:34 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-07 9:59 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-07 11:27 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-07 13:03 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-01 13:20 ` [PATCH v15 07/11] target/s390x/cpu topology: activating CPU topology Pierre Morel
2023-02-06 11:57 ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-06 13:19 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-01 13:20 ` [PATCH v15 08/11] qapi/s390x/cpu topology: x-set-cpu-topology monitor command Pierre Morel
2023-02-06 12:21 ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-06 14:03 ` Pierre Morel [this message]
2023-02-07 14:59 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-08 18:40 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-09 13:14 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-01 13:20 ` [PATCH v15 09/11] machine: adding s390 topology to query-cpu-fast Pierre Morel
2023-02-06 12:38 ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-06 14:12 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-06 12:41 ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-06 12:49 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-02-06 13:09 ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-06 14:50 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-02-07 10:10 ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-06 14:16 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-07 18:26 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-08 9:11 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-01 13:20 ` [PATCH v15 10/11] qapi/s390x/cpu topology: CPU_POLARITY_CHANGE qapi event Pierre Morel
2023-02-08 17:35 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-08 19:23 ` Markus Armbruster
2023-02-09 12:28 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-09 13:00 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-09 14:50 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-09 10:04 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-02-09 12:12 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-09 12:15 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-02-01 13:20 ` [PATCH v15 11/11] docs/s390x/cpu topology: document s390x cpu topology Pierre Morel
2023-02-08 16:22 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-09 17:14 ` [PATCH v15 00/11] s390x: CPU Topology Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-10 13:23 ` Pierre Morel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=16114dce-778c-1416-5b68-4ee3bea135c0@linux.ibm.com \
--to=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=clg@kaod.org \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=nsg@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox