From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
To: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Cc: frankja@linux.ibm.com, thuth@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
cohuck@redhat.com, imbrenda@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com
Subject: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v1 3/4] s390x: topology: check the Perform Topology Function
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2021 10:48:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1628498934-20735-4-git-send-email-pmorel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1628498934-20735-1-git-send-email-pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
We check the PTF instruction.
- We do not expect to support vertical polarization.
- We do not expect the Modified Topology Change Report to be
pending or not at the moment the first PTF instruction with
PTF_CHECK function code is done as some code already did run
a polarization change may have occur.
Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
---
s390x/Makefile | 1 +
s390x/topology.c | 87 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
s390x/unittests.cfg | 3 ++
3 files changed, 91 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 s390x/topology.c
diff --git a/s390x/Makefile b/s390x/Makefile
index 6565561b..c82b7dbf 100644
--- a/s390x/Makefile
+++ b/s390x/Makefile
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ tests += $(TEST_DIR)/mvpg.elf
tests += $(TEST_DIR)/uv-host.elf
tests += $(TEST_DIR)/edat.elf
tests += $(TEST_DIR)/mvpg-sie.elf
+tests += $(TEST_DIR)/topology.elf
tests_binary = $(patsubst %.elf,%.bin,$(tests))
ifneq ($(HOST_KEY_DOCUMENT),)
diff --git a/s390x/topology.c b/s390x/topology.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..4146189a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/s390x/topology.c
@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
+/*
+ * CPU Topology
+ *
+ * Copyright (c) 2021 IBM Corp
+ *
+ * Authors:
+ * Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
+ */
+
+#include <libcflat.h>
+#include <asm/page.h>
+#include <asm/asm-offsets.h>
+#include <asm/interrupt.h>
+#include <asm/facility.h>
+#include <smp.h>
+#include <sclp.h>
+
+static uint8_t pagebuf[PAGE_SIZE * 2] __attribute__((aligned(PAGE_SIZE * 2)));
+int machine_level;
+int mnest;
+
+#define PTF_HORIZONTAL 0
+#define PTF_VERTICAL 1
+#define PTF_CHECK 2
+
+#define PTF_ERR_NO_REASON 0
+#define PTF_ERR_ALRDY_POLARIZED 1
+#define PTF_ERR_IN_PROGRESS 2
+
+static int ptf(unsigned long fc, unsigned long *rc)
+{
+ int cc;
+
+ asm volatile(
+ " .insn rre,0xb9a20000,%1,%1\n"
+ " ipm %0\n"
+ " srl %0,28\n"
+ : "=d" (cc), "+d" (fc)
+ : "d" (fc)
+ : "cc");
+
+ *rc = fc >> 8;
+ return cc;
+}
+
+static void test_ptf(void)
+{
+ unsigned long rc;
+ int cc;
+
+ report_prefix_push("Topology Report pending");
+ /*
+ * At this moment the topology may already have changed
+ * since the VM has been started.
+ * However, we can test if a second PTF instruction
+ * reports that the topology did not change since the
+ * preceding PFT instruction.
+ */
+ ptf(PTF_CHECK, &rc);
+ cc = ptf(PTF_CHECK, &rc);
+ report(cc == 0, "PTF check clear");
+ cc = ptf(PTF_HORIZONTAL, &rc);
+ report(cc == 2 && rc == PTF_ERR_ALRDY_POLARIZED,
+ "PTF horizontal already configured");
+ cc = ptf(PTF_VERTICAL, &rc);
+ report(cc == 2 && rc == PTF_ERR_NO_REASON,
+ "PTF vertical non possible");
+
+ report_prefix_pop();
+}
+
+int main(int argc, char *argv[])
+{
+ report_prefix_push("stsi");
+
+ if (!test_facility(11)) {
+ report_skip("Topology facility not present");
+ goto end;
+ }
+
+ report_info("Machine level %ld", stsi_get_fc(pagebuf));
+
+ test_ptf();
+end:
+ return report_summary();
+}
diff --git a/s390x/unittests.cfg b/s390x/unittests.cfg
index 9e1802fd..0f84d279 100644
--- a/s390x/unittests.cfg
+++ b/s390x/unittests.cfg
@@ -109,3 +109,6 @@ file = edat.elf
[mvpg-sie]
file = mvpg-sie.elf
+
+[topology]
+file = topology.elf
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-09 8:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-09 8:48 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v1 0/4] S390x: CPU Topology Information Pierre Morel
2021-08-09 8:48 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v1 1/4] s390x: lib: Add SCLP toplogy nested level Pierre Morel
2021-08-09 9:53 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2021-08-09 14:23 ` Pierre Morel
2021-08-09 8:48 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v1 2/4] s390x: lib: Move stsi_get_fc to library Pierre Morel
2021-08-09 9:53 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2021-08-09 10:16 ` Janosch Frank
2021-08-09 14:23 ` Pierre Morel
2021-08-09 8:48 ` Pierre Morel [this message]
2021-08-09 10:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v1 3/4] s390x: topology: check the Perform Topology Function Claudio Imbrenda
2021-08-09 15:24 ` Pierre Morel
2021-08-09 10:12 ` Janosch Frank
2021-08-09 15:57 ` Pierre Morel
2021-08-09 8:48 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v1 4/4] s390x: Topology: checking Configuration Topology Information Pierre Morel
2021-08-09 10:22 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2021-08-09 15:59 ` Pierre Morel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1628498934-20735-4-git-send-email-pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
--to=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox