From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
To: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Cc: frankja@linux.ibm.com, thuth@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
cohuck@redhat.com, imbrenda@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com
Subject: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 2/4] s390x: lib: Simplify stsi_get_fc and move it to library
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 18:22:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1628612544-25130-3-git-send-email-pmorel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1628612544-25130-1-git-send-email-pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
stsi_get_fc is now needed in multiple tests.
As it does not need to store information but only returns
the machine level, suppress the address parameter.
Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
---
lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++
s390x/stsi.c | 20 ++------------------
2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h b/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h
index 15cf7d48..2f70d840 100644
--- a/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h
+++ b/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h
@@ -328,6 +328,22 @@ static inline int stsi(void *addr, int fc, int sel1, int sel2)
return cc;
}
+static inline unsigned long stsi_get_fc(void)
+{
+ register unsigned long r0 asm("0") = 0;
+ register unsigned long r1 asm("1") = 0;
+ int cc;
+
+ asm volatile("stsi 0\n"
+ "ipm %[cc]\n"
+ "srl %[cc],28\n"
+ : "+d" (r0), [cc] "=d" (cc)
+ : "d" (r1)
+ : "cc", "memory");
+ assert(!cc);
+ return r0 >> 28;
+}
+
static inline int servc(uint32_t command, unsigned long sccb)
{
int cc;
diff --git a/s390x/stsi.c b/s390x/stsi.c
index 87d48047..391f8849 100644
--- a/s390x/stsi.c
+++ b/s390x/stsi.c
@@ -71,28 +71,12 @@ static void test_priv(void)
report_prefix_pop();
}
-static inline unsigned long stsi_get_fc(void *addr)
-{
- register unsigned long r0 asm("0") = 0;
- register unsigned long r1 asm("1") = 0;
- int cc;
-
- asm volatile("stsi 0(%[addr])\n"
- "ipm %[cc]\n"
- "srl %[cc],28\n"
- : "+d" (r0), [cc] "=d" (cc)
- : "d" (r1), [addr] "a" (addr)
- : "cc", "memory");
- assert(!cc);
- return r0 >> 28;
-}
-
static void test_fc(void)
{
report(stsi(pagebuf, 7, 0, 0) == 3, "invalid fc");
report(stsi(pagebuf, 1, 0, 1) == 3, "invalid selector 1");
report(stsi(pagebuf, 1, 1, 0) == 3, "invalid selector 2");
- report(stsi_get_fc(pagebuf) >= 2, "query fc >= 2");
+ report(stsi_get_fc() >= 2, "query fc >= 2");
}
static void test_3_2_2(void)
@@ -112,7 +96,7 @@ static void test_3_2_2(void)
report_prefix_push("3.2.2");
/* Is the function code available at all? */
- if (stsi_get_fc(pagebuf) < 3) {
+ if (stsi_get_fc() < 3) {
report_skip("Running under lpar, no level 3 to test.");
goto out;
}
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-10 16:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-10 16:22 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 0/4] S390x: CPU Topology Information Pierre Morel
2021-08-10 16:22 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 1/4] s390x: lib: Add SCLP toplogy nested level Pierre Morel
2021-08-11 14:59 ` Janosch Frank
2021-08-12 8:36 ` Pierre Morel
2021-08-12 12:56 ` Cornelia Huck
2021-08-12 15:05 ` Pierre Morel
2021-08-12 15:12 ` Cornelia Huck
2021-08-10 16:22 ` Pierre Morel [this message]
2021-08-11 15:01 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 2/4] s390x: lib: Simplify stsi_get_fc and move it to library Janosch Frank
2021-08-12 8:38 ` Pierre Morel
2021-08-18 7:45 ` Thomas Huth
2021-08-23 9:17 ` Pierre Morel
2021-08-10 16:22 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 3/4] s390x: topology: Check the Perform Topology Function Pierre Morel
2021-08-12 9:38 ` Janosch Frank
2021-08-12 11:40 ` Pierre Morel
2021-08-10 16:22 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 4/4] s390x: topology: Checking Configuration Topology Information Pierre Morel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1628612544-25130-3-git-send-email-pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
--to=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox