public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Mi, Dapeng" <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
To: Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
	Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>,
	Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@amd.com>
Cc: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>,
	Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 06/13] target/i386: Increase MSR_BUF_SIZE and split KVM_[GET/SET]_MSRS calls
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2026 11:09:23 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <198db4f2-4aec-4930-97bf-ed0c3418083e@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260304180713.360471-7-zide.chen@intel.com>

LGTM. Thanks.

Reviewed-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>

On 3/5/2026 2:07 AM, Zide Chen wrote:
> Newer Intel server CPUs support a large number of PMU MSRs.  Currently,
> QEMU allocates cpu->kvm_msr_buf as a single-page buffer, which is not
> sufficient to hold all possible MSRs.
>
> Increase MSR_BUF_SIZE to 8192 bytes, providing space for up to 511 MSRs.
> This is sufficient even for the theoretical worst case, such as
> architectural LBR with a depth of 64.
>
> KVM_[GET/SET]_MSRS is limited to 255 MSRs per call.  Raising this limit
> to 511 would require changes in KVM and would introduce backward
> compatibility issues.  Instead, split requests into multiple
> KVM_[GET/SET]_MSRS calls when the number of MSRs exceeds the API limit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>
> ---
> v3:
> - Address Dapeng's comments.
> ---
>  target/i386/kvm/kvm.c | 110 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 92 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/i386/kvm/kvm.c b/target/i386/kvm/kvm.c
> index 39a67c58ac22..4ba54151320f 100644
> --- a/target/i386/kvm/kvm.c
> +++ b/target/i386/kvm/kvm.c
> @@ -97,9 +97,12 @@
>  #define KVM_APIC_BUS_CYCLE_NS       1
>  #define KVM_APIC_BUS_FREQUENCY      (1000000000ULL / KVM_APIC_BUS_CYCLE_NS)
>  
> -/* A 4096-byte buffer can hold the 8-byte kvm_msrs header, plus
> - * 255 kvm_msr_entry structs */
> -#define MSR_BUF_SIZE 4096
> +/* A 8192-byte buffer can hold the 8-byte kvm_msrs header, plus
> + * 511 kvm_msr_entry structs */
> +#define MSR_BUF_SIZE      8192
> +
> +/* Maximum number of MSRs in one single KVM_[GET/SET]_MSRS call. */
> +#define KVM_MAX_IO_MSRS   255
>  
>  typedef bool QEMURDMSRHandler(X86CPU *cpu, uint32_t msr, uint64_t *val);
>  typedef bool QEMUWRMSRHandler(X86CPU *cpu, uint32_t msr, uint64_t val);
> @@ -4016,21 +4019,99 @@ static void kvm_msr_entry_add_perf(X86CPU *cpu, FeatureWordArray f)
>      }
>  }
>  
> -static int kvm_buf_set_msrs(X86CPU *cpu)
> +static int __kvm_buf_set_msrs(X86CPU *cpu, struct kvm_msrs *msrs)
>  {
> -    int ret = kvm_vcpu_ioctl(CPU(cpu), KVM_SET_MSRS, cpu->kvm_msr_buf);
> +    int ret = kvm_vcpu_ioctl(CPU(cpu), KVM_SET_MSRS, msrs);
>      if (ret < 0) {
>          return ret;
>      }
>  
> -    if (ret < cpu->kvm_msr_buf->nmsrs) {
> -        struct kvm_msr_entry *e = &cpu->kvm_msr_buf->entries[ret];
> +    if (ret < msrs->nmsrs) {
> +        struct kvm_msr_entry *e = &msrs->entries[ret];
>          error_report("error: failed to set MSR 0x%" PRIx32 " to 0x%" PRIx64,
>                       (uint32_t)e->index, (uint64_t)e->data);
>      }
>  
> -    assert(ret == cpu->kvm_msr_buf->nmsrs);
> -    return 0;
> +    assert(ret == msrs->nmsrs);
> +    return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int __kvm_buf_get_msrs(X86CPU *cpu, struct kvm_msrs *msrs)
> +{
> +    int ret;
> +
> +    ret = kvm_vcpu_ioctl(CPU(cpu), KVM_GET_MSRS, msrs);
> +    if (ret < 0) {
> +        return ret;
> +    }
> +
> +    if (ret < msrs->nmsrs) {
> +        struct kvm_msr_entry *e = &msrs->entries[ret];
> +        error_report("error: failed to get MSR 0x%" PRIx32,
> +                     (uint32_t)e->index);
> +    }
> +
> +    assert(ret == msrs->nmsrs);
> +    return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int kvm_buf_set_or_get_msrs(X86CPU *cpu, bool is_write)
> +{
> +    struct kvm_msr_entry *entries = cpu->kvm_msr_buf->entries;
> +    struct kvm_msrs *buf = NULL;
> +    int current, remaining, ret = 0;
> +    size_t buf_size;
> +
> +    buf_size = KVM_MAX_IO_MSRS * sizeof(struct kvm_msr_entry) +
> +               sizeof(struct kvm_msrs);
> +    buf = g_malloc(buf_size);
> +
> +    remaining = cpu->kvm_msr_buf->nmsrs;
> +    current = 0;
> +    while (remaining) {
> +        size_t size;
> +
> +        memset(buf, 0, buf_size);
> +
> +        if (remaining > KVM_MAX_IO_MSRS) {
> +            buf->nmsrs = KVM_MAX_IO_MSRS;
> +        } else {
> +            buf->nmsrs = remaining;
> +        }
> +
> +        size = buf->nmsrs * sizeof(entries[0]);
> +        memcpy(buf->entries, &entries[current], size);
> +
> +        if (is_write) {
> +            ret = __kvm_buf_set_msrs(cpu, buf);
> +        } else {
> +            ret = __kvm_buf_get_msrs(cpu, buf);
> +        }
> +
> +        if (ret < 0) {
> +            goto out;
> +        }
> +
> +        if (!is_write)
> +            memcpy(&entries[current], buf->entries, size);
> +
> +        current += buf->nmsrs;
> +        remaining -= buf->nmsrs;
> +    }
> +
> +out:
> +    g_free(buf);
> +    return ret < 0 ? ret : cpu->kvm_msr_buf->nmsrs;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int kvm_buf_set_msrs(X86CPU *cpu)
> +{
> +    return kvm_buf_set_or_get_msrs(cpu, true);
> +}
> +
> +static inline int kvm_buf_get_msrs(X86CPU *cpu)
> +{
> +    return kvm_buf_set_or_get_msrs(cpu, false);
>  }
>  
>  static void kvm_init_msrs(X86CPU *cpu)
> @@ -4066,7 +4147,7 @@ static void kvm_init_msrs(X86CPU *cpu)
>      if (has_msr_ucode_rev) {
>          kvm_msr_entry_add(cpu, MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, cpu->ucode_rev);
>      }
> -    assert(kvm_buf_set_msrs(cpu) == 0);
> +    kvm_buf_set_msrs(cpu);
>  }
>  
>  static int kvm_put_msrs(X86CPU *cpu, KvmPutState level)
> @@ -4959,18 +5040,11 @@ static int kvm_get_msrs(X86CPU *cpu)
>          }
>      }
>  
> -    ret = kvm_vcpu_ioctl(CPU(cpu), KVM_GET_MSRS, cpu->kvm_msr_buf);
> +    ret = kvm_buf_get_msrs(cpu);
>      if (ret < 0) {
>          return ret;
>      }
>  
> -    if (ret < cpu->kvm_msr_buf->nmsrs) {
> -        struct kvm_msr_entry *e = &cpu->kvm_msr_buf->entries[ret];
> -        error_report("error: failed to get MSR 0x%" PRIx32,
> -                     (uint32_t)e->index);
> -    }
> -
> -    assert(ret == cpu->kvm_msr_buf->nmsrs);
>      /*
>       * MTRR masks: Each mask consists of 5 parts
>       * a  10..0: must be zero

  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-06  3:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-04 18:06 [PATCH V3 00/13] target/i386: Misc PMU fixes and enabling Zide Chen
2026-03-04 18:07 ` [PATCH V3 01/13] target/i386: Disable unsupported BTS for guest Zide Chen
2026-03-04 18:07 ` [PATCH V3 02/13] target/i386: Don't save/restore PERF_GLOBAL_OVF_CTRL MSRs Zide Chen
2026-03-04 18:07 ` [PATCH V3 03/13] target/i386: Gate enable_pmu on kvm_enabled() Zide Chen
2026-03-04 18:07 ` [PATCH V3 04/13] target/i386: Adjust maximum number of PMU counters Zide Chen
2026-03-06  3:02   ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-03-04 18:07 ` [PATCH V3 05/13] target/i386: Support full-width writes for perf counters Zide Chen
2026-03-04 18:07 ` [PATCH V3 06/13] target/i386: Increase MSR_BUF_SIZE and split KVM_[GET/SET]_MSRS calls Zide Chen
2026-03-06  3:09   ` Mi, Dapeng [this message]
2026-03-04 18:07 ` [PATCH V3 07/13] target/i386: Add get/set/migrate support for legacy PEBS MSRs Zide Chen
2026-03-06  3:17   ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-03-04 18:07 ` [PATCH V3 08/13] target/i386: Make some PEBS features user-visible Zide Chen
2026-03-06  3:25   ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-03-04 18:07 ` [PATCH V3 09/13] target/i386: Clean up LBR format handling Zide Chen
2026-03-04 18:07 ` [PATCH V3 10/13] target/i386: Refactor " Zide Chen
2026-03-04 18:07 ` [PATCH V3 11/13] target/i386: Add pebs-fmt CPU option Zide Chen
2026-03-06  5:23   ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-03-04 18:07 ` [PATCH V3 12/13] target/i386: Clean up Intel Debug Store feature dependencies Zide Chen
2026-03-06  5:34   ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-03-16  3:21   ` Chenyi Qiang
2026-03-16  6:57     ` Xiaoyao Li
2026-03-16 18:17       ` Chen, Zide
2026-03-16 18:17     ` Chen, Zide
2026-03-04 18:07 ` [PATCH V3 13/13] target/i386: Add Topdown metrics feature support Zide Chen
2026-03-06  5:37   ` Mi, Dapeng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=198db4f2-4aec-4930-97bf-ed0c3418083e@linux.intel.com \
    --to=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dongli.zhang@oracle.com \
    --cc=farosas@suse.de \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=sandipan.das@amd.com \
    --cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
    --cc=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=zide.chen@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox