From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
To: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, borntraeger@de.ibm.com,
frankja@linux.ibm.com, cohuck@redhat.com, david@redhat.com,
thuth@redhat.com, gor@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/1] s390x: KVM: accept STSI for CPU topology information
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 16:46:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1b2903fa-7b83-418d-8fa6-9bdf9ad19640@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YbdlDFLjZzpC6RRd@osiris>
On 12/13/21 16:21, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 03:26:58PM +0100, Pierre Morel wrote:
>>> Why is this assumption necessary? The statement that Linux runs only
>>> with horizontal polarization is not true.
>>>
>>
>> Right, I will rephrase this as:
>>
>> "Polarization change is not taken into account, QEMU intercepts queries for
>> polarization change (PTF) and only provides horizontal polarization
>> indication to Guest's Linux."
>>
>> @Heiko, I did not find any usage of the polarization in the kernel other
>> than an indication in the sysfs. Is there currently other use of the
>> polarization that I did not see?
>
> You can change polarization by writing to /sys/devices/system/cpu/dispatching.
>
> Or alternativel use the chcpu tool to change polarization. There is
> however no real support for vertical polarization implemented in the
> kernel. Therefore changing to vertical polarization is _not_
> recommended, since it will most likely have negative performance
> impacts on your Linux system.
> However the interface is still there for experimental purposes.
>
Thanks, so I guess that not reflecting polarization changes to the guest
topology will be OK for the moment.
Of course, I will change the wrong comment.
--
Pierre Morel
IBM Lab Boeblingen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-13 15:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-22 13:14 [PATCH v5 0/1] s390x: KVM: CPU Topology Pierre Morel
2021-11-22 13:14 ` [PATCH v5 1/1] s390x: KVM: accept STSI for CPU topology information Pierre Morel
2021-12-07 9:43 ` Pierre Morel
2021-12-09 12:36 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2021-12-09 13:31 ` Pierre Morel
2021-12-09 15:54 ` Heiko Carstens
2021-12-13 10:05 ` Pierre Morel
2021-12-13 14:26 ` Pierre Morel
2021-12-13 15:21 ` Heiko Carstens
2021-12-13 15:46 ` Pierre Morel [this message]
2021-12-09 16:08 ` Janosch Frank
2021-12-13 10:16 ` Pierre Morel
2021-12-14 9:01 ` [PATCH v5 0/1] s390x: KVM: CPU Topology Alexandra Winter
2021-12-16 15:16 ` Pierre Morel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1b2903fa-7b83-418d-8fa6-9bdf9ad19640@linux.ibm.com \
--to=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox