public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
To: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: borntraeger@de.ibm.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com,
	cohuck@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	frankja@linux.ibm.com, akrowiak@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com,
	schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com,
	freude@linux.ibm.com, mimu@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/7] s390: ap: setup relation betwen KVM and mediated device
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 17:48:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1dd78905-bc87-d47c-6e8a-ba0a2a00102d@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190319162712.37f804f8@oc2783563651>

On 19/03/2019 16:27, Halil Pasic wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 15:47:05 +0100
> Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
>>>>>>>         if (matrix_mdev->kvm)
>>>>>>>             kvm_arch_crypto_clear_masks(matrix_mdev->kvm);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This still conditional?
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, nothing to clear if there is no KVM.
>>>>>   
>>>>
>>>> Since we have ensured the open only works if there is a KVM at that
>>>> point in time, and we have taken a reference to KVM, I would expect
>>>> KVM can not go away before we give up our reference.
>>>
>>> Right.
>>
>> Right but based on the assumption we do a kvm_get_kvm() during open.
>>
>> But now we will do it inside the notifier, so the logic is to do a
>> kvm_put_kvm in the notifier too.
>> This is important because userland will ask us to release the KVM/VFIO
>> link through this notifier.
>> So I will have to rework this part where KVM==NULL in the notifier too.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Pierre
> 
> I think it can be done both ways. If you ensure KVM != NULL if the open
> succeeds and take the reference in the notifier. I suppose if open()
> fails release() won't be called. But the logic/code in open() would get
> quite ugly because the callback could be called assync so that it
> overlaps with the rest of open().

Not necessary, but there is more than just the kvm_get_kvm().

When the user calls KVM_DEV_VFIO_GROUP_DEL he asks to break the link 
between VFIO and KVM.

Currently we just ignore this instead of stopping all activity 
associated with KVM.

But we have more bugs there:
We should not support multiple open of the mdev which will overwrite 
matrix->kvm for the same mdev with a different KVM.
I send a bugfix for this.


> 
> Not failing open() in case of no KVM is there yet is in my opinion
> cleaner anyway.

If we handle correctly the notifiers and the exclusivity, we can do this.
I will make this correctly for the next iteration.

Regards,
Pierre

> 
> Regards,
> Halil
> 


-- 
Pierre Morel
Linux/KVM/QEMU in Böblingen - Germany

  reply	other threads:[~2019-03-19 16:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-13 16:04 [PATCH v5 0/7] vfio: ap: AP Queue Interrupt Control Pierre Morel
2019-03-13 16:04 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] s390: ap: kvm: add PQAP interception for AQIC Pierre Morel
2019-03-15 10:20   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-03-15 13:26     ` Pierre Morel
2019-03-15 13:41       ` Cornelia Huck
2019-03-15 13:44         ` Pierre Morel
2019-03-15 14:10       ` Pierre Morel
2019-03-15 17:43         ` Halil Pasic
2019-03-19  9:55         ` Pierre Morel
2019-03-15 17:28       ` Halil Pasic
2019-03-19 10:01         ` Pierre Morel
2019-03-19 14:54           ` Halil Pasic
2019-03-19 17:07             ` Pierre Morel
2019-03-21 14:05               ` Pierre Morel
2019-03-13 16:04 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] s390: ap: new vfio_ap_queue structure Pierre Morel
2019-03-15 10:33   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-03-15 13:29     ` Pierre Morel
2019-03-13 16:05 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] vfio: ap: register IOMMU VFIO notifier Pierre Morel
2019-03-13 16:05 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] s390: ap: setup relation betwen KVM and mediated device Pierre Morel
2019-03-15 18:15   ` Halil Pasic
2019-03-19  9:38     ` Pierre Morel
2019-03-19 11:54       ` Halil Pasic
2019-03-19 14:23         ` Pierre Morel
2019-03-19 14:47           ` Pierre Morel
2019-03-19 15:27             ` Halil Pasic
2019-03-19 16:48               ` Pierre Morel [this message]
2019-03-13 16:05 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] s390: ap: implement PAPQ AQIC interception in kernel Pierre Morel
2019-03-13 16:05 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] s390: ap: Cleanup on removing the AP device Pierre Morel
2019-03-13 16:05 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] s390: ap: kvm: Enable PQAP/AQIC facility for the guest Pierre Morel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1dd78905-bc87-d47c-6e8a-ba0a2a00102d@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=akrowiak@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=freude@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mimu@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox