From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: KVM & Xen coexist? Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 14:43:21 +0100 Message-ID: <200611081443.22464.arnd@arndb.de> References: <4551A416.1050701@qumranet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: To: kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org In-Reply-To: <4551A416.1050701-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 08 November 2006 10:32, Avi Kivity wrote: > Another option is to use a small subset of kvm to run paravirtualized > Xen guests on top of kvm (without Xen itself). How about running Xen inside of kvm? Since kvm can do full virtualization, it should work for all versions of Xen that don't use the HV instruction set extension themselves, right? Arnd <>< ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642