From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/38] KVM: Create kvm-intel.ko module
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 20:24:52 +0000
Message-ID: <20061130202452.GA24987@infradead.org>
References: <456AD5C6.1090406@qumranet.com> <20061127121136.DC69A25015E@cleopatra.q> <20061127123606.GA11825@elte.hu> <20061130142435.GA13372@infradead.org> <20061130154425.GB28507@elte.hu> <20061130115957.c3761331.akpm@osdl.org> <20061130201935.GA14696@elte.hu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>, kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner+glk-linux-kernel-3=40m.gmane.org-S1031375AbWK3UZH@vger.kernel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20061130201935.GA14696@elte.hu>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 09:19:35PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > I get the feeling we'd be best off if we were to revisit this in a 
> > year or so.
> 
> yeah. I'd suggest merging it as-is into v2.6.20. In a year we'll have 
> some real APIs to think about.

Agreed.  And because of that I think keeping it in drivers/ for now
makes a lot of sense - it's just a driver we can deprecate if/when things
have evolved into a real infrastructure.