From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Muli Ben-Yehuda Subject: Re: More virtio users Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 11:06:02 +0300 Message-ID: <20070610080602.GD3738@rhun.haifa.ibm.com> References: <466BA965.6050208@qumranet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: kvm-devel , Rusty Russell , xen-devel , virtualization To: Avi Kivity Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <466BA965.6050208@qumranet.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 10:33:57AM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: > It is worthwhile, when designing virtio, to keep in mind as many > possible users as possible. In addition to block and net, I see at > least the following: > > - vmgl (paravirtualized 3D graphics) > [http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~andreslc/xen-gl/] > - scsi (for tape, cd writer, etc.) > - framebuffer (with just one request to share the framebuffer?) > > There are probably more. Any ideas? - Fast inter-domain networking, a-la XenSocket. - PCI (or your favorite HW bus) passthrough, for your favorite oddball device (e.g., crypto-accelerators). Cheers, Muli