From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Brook Subject: Re: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BQemu-devel=5D_Re=3A_=5BPATCH_0/4=5D?= =?iso-8859-1?q?_Rework_alarm_timer=09infrastrucure_-=09take2?= Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 14:57:19 +0100 Message-ID: <200708191457.21237.paul@codesourcery.com> References: <20070817231149.544849769@gmail.com> <20070819131042.GA22798@mail.shareable.org> <46C84A16.7040305@qumranet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org, Jamie Lokier , Avi Kivity To: qemu-devel-qX2TKyscuCcdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: <46C84A16.7040305-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org > Yes, good thinking, but this should only be done if it actually impacts > something. Reducing overhead from 0.1% to 0.05% is not worthwhile if it > introduces extra complexity. If the overhead is that small, why are we touching this code in the first place? Paul ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/