From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon Subject: Re: [RFC] passthrough for configure options to qemu Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 18:49:05 -0500 Message-ID: <20071022234905.GA28523@tapir> References: <20071019151940.GB15533@tapir> <471B372E.2080807@qumranet.com> <20071022185853.GA25818@tapir> <471CFF3C.10500@qumranet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org To: Avi Kivity Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <471CFF3C.10500-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 09:51:24PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: > Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 01:25:34PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: > >>> > >> Is it possible in case of a failure due to an unrecognized option to > >> call out usage() instead of qemu's? > > > > not sure what you mean, but qemu's configure ignores any unrecognized options > > so it won't fail. > > > > That's a bug. I'm sure qemu-devel would appreciate a patch. I think that was a feature instead, considering that there is almost no implementation for reinforcing the defaults and so --disable-alsa (as an example) will fail as an unknown option. nevertheless will try to upstream the changes required Carlo ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/