From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] raise tsc clocksource rating
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 23:36:00 +0100
Message-ID: <20071029223600.GA21296@elte.hu>
References: <11936994092607-git-send-email-gcosta@redhat.com> <alpine.LFD.0.9999.0710292315280.3186@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>, --cc@redhat.com,
	avi@quramnet.com, kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner+glk-linux-kernel-3=40m.gmane.org-S1754769AbXJ2WhG@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.0.9999.0710292315280.3186@localhost.localdomain>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org


* Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:

> > Since it's being a tendency among paravirt clocksources to use 
> > values around 400, we should declare tsc as even better: So we use 
> > 500.
> > 
> > This patch also touches the comments on clocksource.h, which 
> > suggests that 499 would be a limit on the rating values.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

	Ingo