From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christian Borntraeger Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: Fix accounting of interrupts during guest execution on s390 Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 16:47:45 +0100 Message-ID: <200711141647.45810.borntraeger@de.ibm.com> References: <200711141632.37004.borntraeger@de.ibm.com> <20071114153651.GA3441@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm-devel , Laurent Vivier , Avi Kivity To: Ingo Molnar Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20071114153651.GA3441-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org Am Mittwoch, 14. November 2007 schrieb Ingo Molnar: > > * Christian Borntraeger wrote: > > > Avi, Ingo, Laurent, > > > > what do you think about the following patch? > > fine to me. I guess this should mostly be a NOP to KVM, right? Yes, currently kvm on x86 has interrupts disabled during vmx and svm. So in_interrupt should be always false on x86. Christian ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/