From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christian Borntraeger Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: Fix accounting of interrupts during guest execution on s390 Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 17:07:40 +0100 Message-ID: <200711141707.40347.borntraeger@de.ibm.com> References: <200711141632.37004.borntraeger@de.ibm.com> <200711141647.45810.borntraeger@de.ibm.com> <473B1C97.2010007@qumranet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm-devel , Laurent Vivier To: Avi Kivity Return-path: In-Reply-To: <473B1C97.2010007-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org Am Mittwoch, 14. November 2007 schrieb Avi Kivity: > But isn't account_system_time() called via the timer tick interrupt, and > never directly from kvm? So in_interrupt() would always be true. Ouch, yes. Please dont use that patch, I will make a new one. Christian ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/