public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Laurent Vivier <Laurent.Vivier-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org>
Cc: kvm-devel
	<kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org>,
	Avi Kivity <avi-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kvm: Fix accounting of interrupts during guest execution on s390
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 16:56:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200711151656.44935.borntraeger@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1195140247.4704.14.camel@frecb07144>

Am Donnerstag, 15. November 2007 schrieb Laurent Vivier:
> If I remember correctly time accounting on s390 is more accurate than on
> x86 ?

Yes. its done during context switches and resolution is microsecond.

> Because on x86, as we make the kvm_guest_exit() after local_irq_enable()
> we can also have IRQ with PF_VCPU set... and we discussed a lot on
> probability to know if it was good or not. And on x86 it seems good
> because it is already working like that with system and user time (we
> account time to the space where tick appears).
> see http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/10/15/228

I am not sure I fully understand your point, can you try to explain?

My patch deals with timer ticks (see hardirq_offset). So if a only a tick
comes in after local_irq_enable the time is accounted to guest time as 
before.
I made a test on x86_64 with burnP6 inside a kvm machine. top showed 100%
guest time on an otherwise idle host. So the guest  accounting itself did
still work. I tried some disk and network stress on the host but I did not
manage to bring hardirq+softirq time above 5%, guest time stayed above
90%. At least my simple testcase did not show a bias towards irq time.

> Le jeudi 15 novembre 2007 à 15:10 +0100, Christian Borntraeger a écrit :
> > Avi pointed out, that my first patch was broken, here is the 2nd try.
> > I tested the patch on s390 with CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING and on x86_64.
> > Seems to work.
> > 
> > Currently the scheduler checks for PF_VCPU to decide if this
> > timeslice has to be accounted as guest time. On s390 host 
> > interrupts are not disabled during guest execution. This causes
> > theses interrupts to be accounted as guest time if
> > CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING is set.
> > Solution is to check if an interrupt triggered account_system_time.
> > As the tick is timer interrupt based, we have to subtract
> > hardirq_offset.
> > 
> > Avi, Ingo, Laurent, feedback is welcome.
> > 
> > CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>
> > CC: Avi Kivity <avi-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
> > CC: Laurent Vivier <Laurent.Vivier-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> > ---
> >  kernel/sched.c |    6 ++----
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > Index: kvm/kernel/sched.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- kvm.orig/kernel/sched.c
> > +++ kvm/kernel/sched.c
> > @@ -3395,10 +3395,8 @@ void account_system_time(struct task_str
> >  	struct rq *rq = this_rq();
> >  	cputime64_t tmp;
> >  
> > -	if (p->flags & PF_VCPU) {
> > -		account_guest_time(p, cputime);
> > -		return;
> > -	}
> > +	if ((p->flags & PF_VCPU) && (irq_count() - hardirq_offset == 0))
> > +		return account_guest_time(p, cputime);
> >  
> >  	p->stime = cputime_add(p->stime, cputime);

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/

  reply	other threads:[~2007-11-15 15:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-11-14 15:32 [PATCH] kvm: Fix accounting of interrupts during guest execution on s390 Christian Borntraeger
     [not found] ` <200711141632.37004.borntraeger-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2007-11-14 15:36   ` Ingo Molnar
     [not found]     ` <20071114153651.GA3441-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>
2007-11-14 15:47       ` Christian Borntraeger
     [not found]         ` <200711141647.45810.borntraeger-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2007-11-14 16:04           ` Avi Kivity
     [not found]             ` <473B1C97.2010007-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2007-11-14 16:07               ` Christian Borntraeger
2007-11-15 14:10               ` [PATCH v2] " Christian Borntraeger
     [not found]                 ` <200711151510.37076.borntraeger-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2007-11-15 14:18                   ` Ingo Molnar
2007-11-15 14:23                   ` Avi Kivity
     [not found]                     ` <473C5652.9070706-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2007-11-15 14:38                       ` Christian Borntraeger
     [not found]                         ` <200711151538.16774.borntraeger-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2007-11-15 14:40                           ` Avi Kivity
2007-11-15 15:24                   ` Laurent Vivier
2007-11-15 15:56                     ` Christian Borntraeger [this message]
     [not found]                       ` <200711151656.44935.borntraeger-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2007-11-15 17:08                         ` Laurent Vivier
2007-11-15 18:05                           ` Christian Borntraeger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200711151656.44935.borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --to=borntraeger-ta70fqpds9bqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=Laurent.Vivier-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=avi-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox