From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ryan Harper Subject: Re: PATCH vmx.c: add printk_ratelimit in vmx_intr_assist Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 16:13:59 -0600 Message-ID: <20071214221359.GO23913@us.ibm.com> References: <20071213162110.GJ23913@us.ibm.com> <476296A4.2010407@qumranet.com> <20071214153527.GK23913@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org, Avi Kivity To: Ryan Harper Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071214153527.GK23913-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org * Ryan Harper [2007-12-14 09:36]: > * Avi Kivity [2007-12-14 08:49]: > > Ryan Harper wrote: > > >Add printk_ratelimit check in front of printk. This prevents spamming > > >of the message during 32-bit ubuntu 6.06server install. Previously, it > > >would hang during the partition formatting stage. > > > > > > > Applied, but this is worrying. Do you know whether this is a regression? > > I'll try out older releases to see if we did regress. Looks like kvm-47 introduced the hang during format, -46 finishes the format just fine and with no printk spamming. I'll start seeing if I can bisect down to a particular changeset. -- Ryan Harper Software Engineer; Linux Technology Center IBM Corp., Austin, Tx (512) 838-9253 T/L: 678-9253 ryanh-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace