Re: [PATCH 8/8] SVM: add support for Nested Paging

[Joerg Roedel <joro-zLv9SwRftAIdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>]

On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 10:52:30AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > This patch contains the SVM architecture dependent changes for KVM to enable
> > support for the Nested Paging feature of AMD Barcelona and Phenom processors.
> >  
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> > +static bool npt_enabled = true;
> > +#else
> >  static bool npt_enabled = false;
> > +#endif
> >   
> 
> I think that i386 + pae can also support npt, with no changes, no?
> 
> So we should check CONFIG_X86_PAE, not X86_64.

Yes, I think that too. But its completly untested so I disabled it for
the first post of this patchset.

> > +
> > +	if (npt_enabled) {
> > +		/* Setup VMCB for Nested Paging */
> > +		control->nested_ctl = 1;
> > +		control->intercept_exceptions &= ~(1 << PF_VECTOR);
> > +		control->intercept_cr_read &= ~(INTERCEPT_CR0_MASK|
> > +						INTERCEPT_CR3_MASK|
> > +						INTERCEPT_CR4_MASK);
> > +		control->intercept_cr_write &= ~(INTERCEPT_CR0_MASK|
> > +						 INTERCEPT_CR3_MASK|
> > +						 INTERCEPT_CR4_MASK);
> >   
> 
> What happens to lazy fpu if we don't trap cr0 changes?
> 
> Perhaps it's worth disabling lazy fpu with npt.

It should be implicitly disabled with npt because accesses to cr3 are
not intercepted anymore. The svm_set_cr3 function is the only place
which disables fpu switching.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/