From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrea Arcangeli Subject: Re: swapping with MMU Notifiers V2 Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 18:39:11 +0100 Message-ID: <20080129173911.GP7233@v2.random> References: <20080129145021.GJ7233@v2.random> <479F50D6.4020005@de.ibm.com> <479F532C.1020503@qumranet.com> <20080129165219.GN7233@v2.random> <479F5FBF.40203@de.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org, Avi Kivity To: carsteno-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <479F5FBF.40203-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 06:17:51PM +0100, Carsten Otte wrote: > Andrea Arcangeli wrote: >> Well I already moved that bit to x86, at least that had a good reason >> for being moved there, it's really invisible code to s390. The memslot >> are all but invisible to s390 instead, and so the locking rules of the >> memslots should be common as long as memslots remains a common-code >> data structure too IMHO. > That makes sense to me. Ok thanks! ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/