From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrea Arcangeli Subject: Re: swapping with MMU Notifiers V2 Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 18:49:55 +0100 Message-ID: <20080129174955.GQ7233@v2.random> References: <20080129145021.GJ7233@v2.random> <479F50D6.4020005@de.ibm.com> <20080129164954.GM7233@v2.random> <479F5CBB.5060702@qumranet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: carsteno-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org To: Avi Kivity Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <479F5CBB.5060702-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 07:04:59PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: > Andrea Arcangeli wrote: >> Didn't realize s390 doesn't need those at all. Do you think >> mmu_notifier.h should also go in asm/mmu_notifier? We can always move >> them there later after merging with some compat code if needed. >> > > s390 is the odd bird, not x86, so I'd like a solution that doesn't involve ;) > duplication for x86, ppc, and ia64. There is a few lines of duplication yes, the bulk of the code was already only in x86.c and it has to stay there. It's only the few lines of registration we're talking about it, so I don't think the #ifdef would save enough. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/