From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: KVM binary incompatiablity Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 16:04:27 -0800 Message-ID: <20080208160427.7594c837@extreme> References: <20080208113236.55b2ead1@extreme> <47ACD614.2080000@codemonkey.ws> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Avi Kivity To: Anthony Liguori Return-path: In-Reply-To: <47ACD614.2080000-rdkfGonbjUSkNkDKm+mE6A@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On Fri, 08 Feb 2008 16:22:12 -0600 Anthony Liguori wrote: > Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > I notice that recent KVM is incompatiable with older versions. > > > > Using a KVM image created on 2.6.24 will crash on 2.6.25 (or > > vice versa). It appears that Ubuntu Hardy has incorporated the 2.6.25 > > update even though it claims to be 2.6.24. > > > > This isn't intentional. What is the guest and how does it crash? > > I've been using the same image for most of KVM's development life cycle > without having issues. > > Regards, > > Anthony Liguori > I'll see if I can get a backtrace, it isn't reliably reproducible. -- Stephen Hemminger ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/