From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: [ofa-general] Re: [patch 0/6] MMU Notifiers V6
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 16:12:48 -0800
Message-ID: <20080208161248.506556b0.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
References: <20080208220616.089936205@sgi.com>
	<20080208142315.7fe4b95e.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0802081528070.4036@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
	<20080208233636.GG26564@sgi.com>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0802081540180.4291@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
	<20080208234302.GH26564@sgi.com>
	<20080208155641.2258ad2c.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0802081603430.4543@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: andrea@qumranet.com, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	izike@qumranet.com, steiner@sgi.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, avi@qumranet.com,
	kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, daniel.blueman@quadrics.com,
	Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com>, general@lists.openfabrics.org
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Return-path: <general-bounces@lists.openfabrics.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0802081603430.4543@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general>,
	<mailto:general-request@lists.openfabrics.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.openfabrics.org/pipermail/general>
List-Post: <mailto:general@lists.openfabrics.org>
List-Help: <mailto:general-request@lists.openfabrics.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general>,
	<mailto:general-request@lists.openfabrics.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: general-bounces@lists.openfabrics.org
Errors-To: general-bounces@lists.openfabrics.org
List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org

On Fri, 8 Feb 2008 16:05:00 -0800 (PST) Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 8 Feb 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
> > You took it correctly, and I didn't understand the answer ;)
> 
> We have done several rounds of discussion on linux-kernel about this so 
> far and the IB folks have not shown up to join in. I have tried to make 
> this as general as possible.

infiniband would appear to be the major present in-kernel client of this new
interface.  So as a part of proving its usefulness, correctness, etc we
should surely work on converting infiniband to use it, and prove its
goodness.

Quite possibly none of the infiniband developers even know about it..