From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] my mmu notifiers
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 17:40:50 -0600
Message-ID: <20080219234049.GA27856@sgi.com>
References: <20080219084357.GA22249@wotan.suse.de>
	<20080219135851.GI7128@v2.random>
	<20080219231157.GC18912@wotan.suse.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@qumranet.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Kanoj Sarcar <kanojsarcar@yahoo.com>,
	Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>,
	Steve Wise <swise@opengridcomputing.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>,
	kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, daniel.blueman@quadrics.com,
	Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com>, general@lists.openfabrics.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Return-path: <kvm-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20080219231157.GC18912@wotan.suse.de>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel>,
	<mailto:kvm-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=kvm-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:kvm-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel>,
	<mailto:kvm-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
Sender: kvm-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net
Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net
List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 12:11:57AM +0100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 02:58:51PM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 09:43:57AM +0100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > > anything when changing the pte to be _more_ permissive, and I don't
> > 
> > Note that in my patch the invalidate_pages in mprotect can be
> > trivially switched to a mprotect_pages with proper params. This will
> > prevent page faults completely in the secondary MMU (there will only
> > be tlb misses after the tlb flush just like for the core linux pte),
> > and it'll allow all the secondary MMU pte blocks (512/1024 at time
> > with my PT lock design) to be updated to have proper permissions
> > matching the core linux pte.
> 
> Sorry, I realise I still didn't get this through my head yet (and also
> have not seen your patch recently). So I don't know exactly what you
> are doing...
> 
> But why does _anybody_ (why does Christoph's patches) need to invalidate
> when they are going to be more permissive? This should be done lazily by
> the driver, I would have thought.


Agree. Although for most real applications, the performance difference
is probably negligible.

--- jack

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/