From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: KVM Test result, KVM62-RC2
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 11:00:13 -0300
Message-ID: <20080227140013.GA13385@dmt>
References: <10EA09EFD8728347A513008B6B0DA77A02D3B6A3@pdsmsx411.ccr.corp.intel.com>
	<47C3FEE5.90209@bppiac.hu>
	<1204027963.20221.0.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	<47C40FEE.3080603@bppiac.hu> <47C41673.702@bppiac.hu>
	<20080227045339.GA5159@dmt> <47C53773.8080603@bppiac.hu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@kvack.org>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>,
	kvm-devel <kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
To: Farkas Levente <lfarkas@bppiac.hu>
Return-path: <kvm-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <47C53773.8080603@bppiac.hu>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel>,
	<mailto:kvm-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=kvm-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:kvm-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel>,
	<mailto:kvm-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
Sender: kvm-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net
Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net
List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 11:12:03AM +0100, Farkas Levente wrote:
> > You can workaround these problems by using a different, less problematic
> > clocksource such as acpipm, until the TSC/migration issues are fully
> > resolved.
> > 
> > Add "clocksource=acpi_pm" to the kernel options.
> 
> than just quck question we use the noapic kernel option for the guest (i
> don't remember why but there was some problem without it about half year
> ago). do i still have to use the noapic option for the kernel? (i hope
> somebody remember the reason:-)

Apparently dsahern found that the noapic option fixed or alleviated
rtl8139 problems under high traffic:

https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1802082&group_id=180599&atid=893831

I don't know details of the problem or why noapic made a difference.
Anyone?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/