From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Subject: [ofa-general] Re: [PATCH] mmu notifiers #v8
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2008 03:59:08 +0100
Message-ID: <20080306025908.GC27150@wotan.suse.de>
References: <20080220103942.GU7128@v2.random>
	<20080221045430.GC15215@wotan.suse.de>
	<20080221144023.GC9427@v2.random> <20080221161028.GA14220@sgi.com>
	<20080227192610.GF28483@v2.random>
	<20080302155457.GK8091@v2.random>
	<20080303032934.GA3301@wotan.suse.de>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0803031058230.6917@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
	<20080305003722.GG1510@wotan.suse.de>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0803051048100.29794@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@qumranet.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Izik Eidus <izike@qumranet.com>, Kanoj Sarcar <kanojsarcar@yahoo.com>,
	Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>,
	Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>, kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	daniel.blueman@quadrics.com, Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com>,
	general@lists.openfabrics.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Return-path: <general-bounces@lists.openfabrics.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0803051048100.29794@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general>,
	<mailto:general-request@lists.openfabrics.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.openfabrics.org/pipermail/general>
List-Post: <mailto:general@lists.openfabrics.org>
List-Help: <mailto:general-request@lists.openfabrics.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general>,
	<mailto:general-request@lists.openfabrics.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: general-bounces@lists.openfabrics.org
Errors-To: general-bounces@lists.openfabrics.org
List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 10:48:24AM -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Mar 2008, Nick Piggin wrote:
> 
> > Um, it's bound to the *Linux page tables*, yes. And I have no idea why
> > you would use the paravirt ops for this.
> 
> paravirt ops allows interception of page table operations?

Maybe possible but it's totally the wrong API for it.