Re: [RFC/PATCH 14/15] guest: detect when running on kvm

Carsten Otte
2008-03-21T11:12:04Z

MAILER-DAEMON@linux.ibm.com wrote:
> Since when do we have symbolic names for the bits?
> It was always on my todo list to do a cleanup and replace the numbers
> we use everywhere with names. Especially since we have clashes from time
> to time... but that didn't hurt enough yet, obviously.
> But now that you volunteered to take care of this... :)
Right. We only have defines for (machine_flags & bit). Looks to me
like the bits really should have a name on them. I've created a patch
that does this, but I want to talk it over with Martin before sending
that one out.