From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Brook Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] [RFC] Fix time drift of rtc clock + general support Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 16:19:30 +0000 Message-ID: <200803231619.32472.paul@codesourcery.com> References: <1206282453.18800.31.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: kvm-devel To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, dor.laor@qumranet.com Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1206282453.18800.31.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: kvm-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On Sunday 23 March 2008, Dor Laor wrote: > --- a/qemu/hw/irq.c > +++ b/qemu/hw/irq.c > @@ -30,6 +30,8 @@ struct IRQState { > =A0 =A0 =A0int n; > =A0}; > =A0 > +uint32_t qemu_irq_acked[NR_IRQ_WORDS]; This is absolute rubbish. The whole point of the IRQ framework is that it = doesn't assume a single flat IRQ controller. Paul ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/