From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Robin Holt Subject: Re: [PATCH 1 of 9] Lock the entire mm to prevent any mmu related operation to happen Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:02:13 -0500 Message-ID: <20080416190213.GK22493@sgi.com> References: <20080416163337.GJ22493@sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Nick Piggin , Jack Steiner , Andrea Arcangeli , Peter Zijlstra , kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Kanoj Sarcar , Roland Dreier , Steve Wise , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Avi Kivity , linux-mm@kvack.org, Robin Holt , general@lists.openfabrics.org, Hugh Dickins , akpm@linux-foundation.org To: Christoph Lameter Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: kvm-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 11:35:38AM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Wed, 16 Apr 2008, Robin Holt wrote: > > > I don't think this lock mechanism is completely working. I have > > gotten a few failures trying to dereference 0x100100 which appears to > > be LIST_POISON1. > > How does xpmem unregistering of notifiers work? For the tests I have been running, we are waiting for the release callout as part of exit. Thanks, Robin ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone