[ofa-general] Re: [PATCH 03 of 12] get_task_mm should not succeed if mmput() is running and has reduced

Christoph Lameter
2008-04-22T23:13:20Z

On Wed, 23 Apr 2008, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 01:23:16PM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > Missing signoff by you.
>
> I thought I had to signoff if I conributed with anything that could
> resemble copyright? Given I only merged that patch, I can add an
> Acked-by if you like, but merging this in my patchset was already an
> implicit ack ;-).

No you have to include a signoff if the patch goes through your custody
chain. This one did.

Also add a

From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>

somewhere if you want to signify that the patch came from me.