public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
Cc: kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] Use pipe() to simulate signalfd()
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 20:37:17 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080429233717.GA18425@dmt> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4817AC2E.60909@us.ibm.com>

On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 06:15:58PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> >Problem is if the IO thread _receives_ SIGIPI instead of some vcpu
> >thread. 
> >
> >So there is potential harm in not blocking it.
> >  
> 
> Hrm, aren't SIG_IPIs delivered to a particular thread-id though?  When 
> would the IO thread receive a SIG_IPI?

Right, they are only delivered to specific threads. Still not harmful 
to make it explicit.

> >>>What is the reason for this loop instead of a straight read? 
> >>>
> >>>Its alright to be interrupted by a signal.
> >>> 
> >>>      
> >>Just general habit with QEMU.
> >>    
> >
> >Please don't :-)
> >  
> 
> I don't see the harm.  In fact, I think it's more correct.  Otherwise, 
> we have to wait for another invocation of the fd callback.

Why? If you leave data in the pipe the next select() won't block.

Isnt there the possibility that this loop can be stuck for significant
amounts of time? If you're receiving lots of notifications through
signals.

> >>>>-        kvm_eat_signal(&io_signal_table, NULL, 1000);
> >>>>        pthread_mutex_lock(&qemu_mutex);
> >>>>-        cpu_single_env = NULL;
> >>>>-        main_loop_wait(0);
> >>>>+	main_loop_wait(10);
> >>>>   
> >>>>        
> >>>Increase that 1000 or something. Will make it easier to spot bugs.
> >>> 
> >>>      
> >>I have actually and it does introduce some bugs.  I'm not entirely clear 
> >>what is causing them though.
> >>    
> >
> >Should indicate that some event previously delivered through signals and
> >received by sigtimedwait is not waking up the IO thread.
> >  
> 
> I'll take a look and see.  I'm having time keeping issues in the guest 
> so it's hard to tell what problems are caused by the IO thread verses time.

Time issues only with the patch? If not, please share details.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone

  reply	other threads:[~2008-04-29 23:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-29 14:28 [PATCH][RFC] Use pipe() to simulate signalfd() Anthony Liguori
2008-04-29 22:37 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2008-04-29 22:42   ` Anthony Liguori
2008-04-29 23:13     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2008-04-29 23:15       ` Anthony Liguori
2008-04-29 23:37         ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2008-04-29 23:44           ` Anthony Liguori
2008-04-30  0:08             ` Marcelo Tosatti
2008-04-30  0:22               ` Anthony Liguori
2008-04-30  0:38                 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2008-04-30  0:47                   ` Anthony Liguori
2008-04-30  2:16                     ` Marcelo Tosatti

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080429233717.GA18425@dmt \
    --to=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=avi@qumranet.com \
    --cc=kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox