From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jamie Lokier Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/4] [PATCH] introduce QEMUAccel and fill it with interrupt specific driver Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 19:16:07 +0100 Message-ID: <20080502181607.GA2827@shareable.org> References: <12097505533742-git-send-email-gcosta@redhat.com> <1209750562292-git-send-email-gcosta@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, mtosatti@redhat.com, Glauber Costa To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1209750562292-git-send-email-gcosta@redhat.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: kvm-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org Glauber Costa wrote: > This patch introduces QEMUAccel, a placeholder for function pointers > that aims at helping qemu to abstract accelerators such as kqemu and > kvm (actually, the 'accelerator' name was proposed by avi kivity, since > he loves referring to kvm that way). Just a little thought... Maybe 'VCPU' would be a clearer name? QEMU provides its own VCPU, and KQEMU+QEMU also provide one toegether. While KVM provides essentially one or more whole VCPUs by itself and uses QEMU's drivers only doesn't it? -- Jamie ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone