Re: [PATCH 0/4] paravirt clock patches

Gerd Hoffmann
2008-04-28T12:09:34Z

Avi Kivity wrote:
> The patches look good, but pleasy copy Jeremy and virtualization@ for
> patches which touch things outside kvm.

Will do for the next round.

> It's perhaps better to reverse the order: first fix kvm to be
> compatible, then merge the Xen and kvm implementations into a single one.

Fixing kvm (guest side) would be copying parts of the xen guest code, so
that doesn't make much sense to me ...

cheers,
Gerd

--