From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] stop_machine: make stop_machine_run more virtualization friendly
Date: Fri, 9 May 2008 11:10:11 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200805091110.12271.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200805081520.38310.borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
On Thursday 08 May 2008 23:20:38 Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Changing stop_machine to yield the cpu to the hypervisor when yielding
> inside the guest fixed the problem for me. While I am not completely happy
> with this patch, I think it causes no harm and it really improves the
> situation for me.
Yes, this change is harmless. I'm reworking (ie. rewriting) stop_machine at
the moment to simplify it, and as a side effect it won't be yielding. (The
yield is almost useless, since there's nothing at same priority as this
thread anyway).
I've included this patch for my next push to Linus.
Thanks,
Rusty.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
Use priority code J8TL2D2.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-09 1:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-08 13:20 [PATCH/RFC] stop_machine: make stop_machine_run more virtualization friendly Christian Borntraeger
2008-05-08 13:33 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-08 14:41 ` Christian Borntraeger
2008-05-08 14:58 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-08 16:23 ` Christian Borntraeger
2008-05-09 1:10 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200805091110.12271.rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox