From: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
Cc: kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
kvm-ppc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, jyoung5@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] Reworking KVM_DEBUG_GUEST
Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 16:06:00 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200805141606.00915.hollisb@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <482B422E.3000007@web.de>
On Wednesday 14 May 2008 14:49:02 Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > In Qemu, when exit_reason == KVM_EXIT_DEBUG, it would
> > just need to see if that address is for a breakpoint Qemu set or not. If
so,
> > it's happy. If not, (commence handwaving) tell KVM to forward the debug
> > interrupt to the guest. This way, the list of breakpoints is maintained in
> > userspace (in the qemu gdb stub), which is nice because it could be
> > arbitrarily large.
>
> Yes, but I would rather pass the debug registers (more general: some
> arch dependent state set) back in this slot. Those contain everything
> the gdbstub needs to know to catch relevant hardware-BP/watchpoint
> events (and report them to the gdb frontend).
But what would the stub *do* with the contents of the debug registers? The
only reason they were set is on behalf of the stub in the first place. In
fact, in the case of soft breakpoints, KVM doesn't even know where all the
set breakpoints are. The only thing KVM needs to report is the address of the
breakpoint that was just hit.
Sorry if this gets formatted badly:
gdb qemu stub KVM
break *0xf00
sends Z0 packet 0xf00
0xf00 -> BP list
ioctl(KVM_DEBUG, 0xf00)
continue
ioctl(KVM_RUN)
running...
breakpoint hit
exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_DEBUG
kvm_run.debug.address = current PC value
search BP list for address
bp hit <--- present not present ---> send debug interrupt to guest
Notes:
- KVM_DEBUG in this case will set a hardware breakpoint. The alternative is to
write an int3 into guest memory.
- The stub doesn't care how the hardware registers were configured. All it
needs to know is a) that a breakpoint was hit, and b) at what address.
Does this make sense?
--
Hollis Blanchard
IBM Linux Technology Center
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-14 21:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-12 11:34 [RFC] Reworking KVM_DEBUG_GUEST Jan Kiszka
2008-05-14 15:12 ` Jerone Young
2008-05-14 15:28 ` Jan Kiszka
2008-05-14 15:55 ` Jerone Young
2008-05-14 18:25 ` Hollis Blanchard
2008-05-14 19:10 ` Jan Kiszka
2008-05-14 19:33 ` Hollis Blanchard
2008-05-14 19:49 ` Jan Kiszka
2008-05-14 21:06 ` Hollis Blanchard [this message]
2008-05-14 21:11 ` [kvm-ppc-devel] " Hollis Blanchard
2008-05-14 21:13 ` Hollis Blanchard
2008-05-15 7:47 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200805141606.00915.hollisb@us.ibm.com \
--to=hollisb@us.ibm.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@web.de \
--cc=jyoung5@us.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=kvm-ppc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox