From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Yang, Sheng" <sheng.yang@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] NMI supporting for KVM and VMX v2
Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 18:50:25 +0800
Message-ID: <200805151850.25870.sheng.yang@intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: " kvm-devel" <kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Return-path: <kvm-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net>
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel>,
	<mailto:kvm-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=kvm-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:kvm-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel>,
	<mailto:kvm-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
Sender: kvm-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net
Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net
List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org

Hi

Sorry for the update delays, got a cold recently...

No big modification. I dropped the ordinary first patch following Avi's 
comment, and fixed a bug when handling host NMI in vmx_vcpu_run in second 
patch.

The third patch of enabling NMI watchdog is *not* meant to be merged. It was 
cooked for the test, and it would bring some overhead on interrupt handling, 
as well as regression on some version of Windows now(IRQ_NOT_EQUAL_OR_LESS 
BSOD). But is it necessary to got NMI watchdog support in KVM? If so, maybe 
we need a option(or kernel module parameter) to enable it.

--
Thanks
Yang, Sheng

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft 
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. 
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/