From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: virtio_net: another race with virtio_net and enable_cb
Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 12:36:00 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200805271236.00439.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200805261129.27718.borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
On Monday 26 May 2008 19:29:27 Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Hello Rusty,
Hi Christian,
As always, you post an interesting bug!
> /* Out of packets? */
> if (received < budget) {
> netif_rx_complete(vi->dev, napi);
> if (unlikely(!vi->rvq->vq_ops->enable_cb(vi->rvq))
> && napi_schedule_prep(napi)) {
> vi->rvq->vq_ops->disable_cb(vi->rvq);
> __netif_rx_schedule(vi->dev, napi);
> goto again;
> }
> }
Yes, clearly if napi_schedule_prep() fails (ie. another poll is scheduled), we
don't disable callbacks, and another poll will be run with callbacks enabled,
triggering this bug. It can only happen if the enable_cb succeeds (no new
work) then a new packet arrives before napi_schedule_prep().
You should be able to verify that you are hitting this window by putting a
printk in the !enable_cb && !napi_schedule_prep case.
Now, we can't do an unconditional disable_cb(), as it won't prevent this race,
and would make it worse if it ran after the other poll's enable_cb() and left
us without a callback to wake us up. We could do a disable_cb() at the top
of virtnet_poll, but I certainly don't want to write the comment explaining
why.
So your fix is correct and sensible. Applied.
Thanks!
Rusty.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-27 2:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-26 9:29 virtio_net: another race with virtio_net and enable_cb Christian Borntraeger
2008-05-27 2:36 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2008-05-27 10:25 ` Christian Borntraeger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200805271236.00439.rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox