From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] virtio_blk: check for hardsector size from host
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 18:04:11 +1000
Message-ID: <200805291804.11550.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
References: <200805271105.00077.borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:40779 "EHLO ozlabs.org"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751443AbYE2IEW (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 29 May 2008 04:04:22 -0400
In-Reply-To: <200805271105.00077.borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Tuesday 27 May 2008 19:04:59 Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Rusty, Jens,
>
> I need your opinion on the following patch. It seems to work, but I would
> like to get some feedback if this patch is the right approach:

Looks like the right approach to me.  Don't know about the block side of it...

Just that u64 seems like overkill: u32?

Cheers,
Rusty.