From: Muli Ben-Yehuda <muli@il.ibm.com>
To: Ben-Ami Yassour1 <BENAMI@il.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@qumranet.com>,
aliguori@us.ibm.com, Han Weidong <weidong.han@intel.com>,
"Kay, Allen M" <allen.m.kay@intel.com>,
Amit Shah <amit.shah@qumranet.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, avi@qumranet.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Handle vma regions with no backing page
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 19:17:55 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080604161755.GC7089@il.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1212592164.26322.10.camel@lnx-benami>
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 06:09:24PM +0300, Ben-Ami Yassour1 wrote:
> > > We noticed that pfn_valid does not always works as expected by
> > > this patch to indicate that a pfn has a backing page. We have
> > > seen a case where CONFIG_NUMA was not set and then where
> > > pfn_valid returned 1 for an mmio pfn. We then changed the
> > > config file with CONFIG_NUMA set and it worked fine as expected
> > > (since a different implementation of pfn_valid was used).
> > >
> > > How should we overcome this issue?
> >
> > There's a page_is_ram() too, but that's the e820 map check and it
> > means it's RAM not that there's a page backing store. Certainly if
> > it's not ram we should go ahead with just the pfn but it'd be a
> > workaround.
> >
> > I really think it'd be better off to fix pfn_valid to work for
> > NUMA.
>
> It does work for NUMA, it does not work without the NUMA option.
Andrea, how would you suggest to fix pfn_valid for the CONFIG_NUMA
disabled case?
Cheers,
Muli
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-04 18:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-03 11:17 [PATCH] Handle vma regions with no backing page Ben-Ami Yassour
2008-06-03 11:39 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-06-04 15:09 ` Ben-Ami Yassour
2008-06-04 16:17 ` Muli Ben-Yehuda [this message]
2008-06-04 19:34 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-06-04 19:41 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-06-04 19:51 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-06-04 19:59 ` Dave Hansen
2008-06-04 9:48 ` Avi Kivity
2008-06-04 16:48 ` Anthony Liguori
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-04-29 14:32 Anthony Liguori
2008-04-29 14:54 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-04-29 15:14 ` Anthony Liguori
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080604161755.GC7089@il.ibm.com \
--to=muli@il.ibm.com \
--cc=BENAMI@il.ibm.com \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=allen.m.kay@intel.com \
--cc=amit.shah@qumranet.com \
--cc=andrea@qumranet.com \
--cc=avi@qumranet.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=weidong.han@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox