Re: [PATCH 4/4][VTD] vt-d specific files in KVM

[Muli Ben-Yehuda <muli@il.ibm.com>]

On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 09:26:04AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:

>> Checking against pfn_valid() isn't enough to differentiate between
>> RAM and MMIO areas. I think the consensus was that we also need to
>> check PageReserved(), i.e.,
>>
>> if (pfn_valid(pfn) && !PageReserved(pfn_to_page(pfn))) ...
>>   
>
> When checking the error return of gfn_to_pfn(), you should use
> is_error_pfn().  There's no need to differentiate mmio/ram pages in
> the code, the goal is just error checking.

I'd have to check the exact semantics of is_error_pfn() to see if it
fits, since strictly speaking what we are doing is not checking
pfn_to_page() for errors. We need to differentiate between gfns which
represent RAM (which needs to be mapped into the VT-d page tables) and
gfns which don't (e.g, slots which represent an MMIO region), which
should not be mapped in the VT-d page tables.

Cheers,
Muli