From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Yang, Sheng" <sheng.yang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: VMX: Flush all VPID tagged TLB when VMXON
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 09:30:55 +0800
Message-ID: <200806230930.55451.sheng.yang@intel.com>
References: <200806171739.58655.sheng.yang@intel.com> <485E00C7.70605@qumranet.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
To: Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mga14.intel.com ([143.182.124.37]:44634 "EHLO mga14.intel.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752282AbYFWBav (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 22 Jun 2008 21:30:51 -0400
In-Reply-To: <485E00C7.70605@qumranet.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Sunday 22 June 2008 15:35:35 Avi Kivity wrote:
> Yang, Sheng wrote:
> > From efba05901f8ffca03208217d075f679f78f3469d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Sheng Yang <sheng.yang@intel.com>
> > Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 17:41:10 +0800
> > Subject: [PATCH] KVM: VMX: Flush all VPID tagged TLB when VMXON
>
> Why is this needed?  Don't we flush a vpid immediately after allocating it?

O, damn, I had a bad memory...

Please ignore this...

-- 
Thanks
Yang, Sheng